dc.creatorVaggione, Juan Marco
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-26T19:19:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T10:53:42Z
dc.date.available2020-06-26T19:19:53Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T10:53:42Z
dc.date.created2020-06-26T19:19:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifierVaggione, Juan Marco; The Politics of Camouflage: Conscientious objection as a strategy of the catholic church; Hemi Press; Emisférica; 12; 2; 11-2016
dc.identifier1554-3706
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/108348
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4377847
dc.description.abstractConscientious Objection (CO) has a definition, a genealogy, and a normative use in liberal democracies. It has an official history, so to speak, which vindicates it as a democratic institution that guarantees people the right not to fulfill certain legal obligations considered contrary to certain beliefs (religious as much as secular). This article considers how the advance of the sexual and reproductive rights agenda has generated a growing politicization of CO as a democratic institution that guarantees the pluralism of contemporary societies. Thus, different sectors deploy CO as a way to protect religious freedom from legislation seeking to dismount inequalities entwined with hierarchical sexual orders.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherHemi Press
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://hemisphericinstitute.net/en/emisferica/emisferica-122/4554-the-politics-of-camouflage-conscientious-objection-as-a-strategy-of-the-catholic-church.html
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectCONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION
dc.subjectCATHOLIC CHURCH
dc.titleThe Politics of Camouflage: Conscientious objection as a strategy of the catholic church
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución