dc.creatorAberer, W.
dc.creatorMaurer, M.
dc.creatorReshef, A.
dc.creatorLonghurst, H.
dc.creatorKivity, S.
dc.creatorBygum, A.
dc.creatorCaballero, T.
dc.creatorBloom, B.
dc.creatorNair, N.
dc.creatorMalbrán, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-13T22:33:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T10:42:54Z
dc.date.available2019-11-13T22:33:18Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T10:42:54Z
dc.date.created2019-11-13T22:33:18Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.identifierAberer, W.; Maurer, M.; Reshef, A.; Longhurst, H.; Kivity, S.; et al.; Open-label, multicenter study of self-administered icatibant for attacks of hereditary angioedema; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Allergy; 69; 3; 3-2014; 305-314
dc.identifier1398-9995
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/88835
dc.identifier0105-4538
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4376901
dc.description.abstractBackground: Historically, treatment for hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks has been administered by healthcare professionals (HCPs). Patient self-administration could reduce delays between symptom onset and treatment, and attack burden. The primary objective was to assess the safety of self-administered icatibant in patients with HAE type I or II. Secondary objectives included patient convenience and clinical efficacy of self-administration. Methods: In this phase IIIb, open-label, multicenter study, adult patients were trained to self-administer a single 30-mg icatibant subcutaneous injection to treat their next attack. Icatibant-naïve patients were treated by an HCP prior to self-administration. Evaluations included adverse event (AE) reporting, a validated questionnaire for convenience, and visual analog scale for efficacy. Results: A total of 151 patients were enrolled; 104 had an attack requiring treatment during the study, and 97 patients (19 naïve) were included in the self-administration cohort. Recurrence or worsening of HAE symptoms (22 of 97) was the most commonly reported AE; rescue medications including icatibant (N = 3) and C1-inhibitor concentrate (N = 6) were used in 13 cases. Overall, 89 of 97 patients used a single injection of icatibant. No serious AEs or hospitalizations were reported. Most patients (91.7%) found self-administration preferable to administration in the clinic. The median time to symptom relief (3.8 h) was comparable with results from controlled trials of icatibant. Conclusions: With appropriate training, patients were successfully able to recognize HAE attacks and decide when to self-administer icatibant. This, coupled with the patient-reported high degree of satisfaction, convenience and ease of use supports the adoption of icatibant self-administration in clinical practice.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/all.12303
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/all.12303
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectBRADYKININ
dc.subjectC1-ESTERASE INHIBITOR DEFICIENCY
dc.subjectHEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMA
dc.subjectICATIBANT
dc.subjectSELF-ADMINISTRATION
dc.titleOpen-label, multicenter study of self-administered icatibant for attacks of hereditary angioedema
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución