Argentina | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.contributorMatthews, M. R.
dc.creatorIvarola, Leonardo Abel
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-09T18:43:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T07:44:01Z
dc.date.available2020-12-09T18:43:53Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T07:44:01Z
dc.date.created2020-12-09T18:43:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierIvarola, Leonardo Abel; Social Mechanisms and the Logic of Possibility Trees; Springer; 2019; 397-414
dc.identifier978-3-030-16672-4
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/120022
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4361794
dc.description.abstractMechanisms are usually understood as sequences of events that allow us to explain regular observed behaviors. This mode of thought presupposes an ontology of stable causal factors. In the present paper a critique to this conception in the field of social sciences will be carried out. In particular, it will be argued that social phenomena should be understood under the logic of “possibility trees” or “open-ended results”. Finally, on the basis of Bunge’s distinction between conceptual and concrete systems, a distinction between two kinds of mechanisms will be made: theoretical and material mechanisms.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-16673-1_24
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16673-1_24
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceMario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift
dc.subjectSOCIAL MECHANISMS
dc.subjectMARIO BUNGE
dc.subjectPOSSIBILITY TREES
dc.titleSocial Mechanisms and the Logic of Possibility Trees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución