Is REP a measure of ‘‘objective support’’?

dc.creatorFarris, James S.
dc.creatorGoloboff, Pablo Augusto
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-26T14:39:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T07:17:56Z
dc.date.available2019-08-26T14:39:54Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T07:17:56Z
dc.date.created2019-08-26T14:39:54Z
dc.date.issued2008-09
dc.identifierFarris, James S.; Goloboff, Pablo Augusto; Is REP a measure of ‘‘objective support’’?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Cladistics; 24; 6; 9-2008; 1065-1069
dc.identifier0748-3007
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/82087
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4359538
dc.description.abstractGrant and Kluge have recently stated that Bremer support and their own REP (“relative explanatory power”), are the only objective measures of group support. This paper discusses their claim, showing that their philosophical arguments have no basis, and that their own numerical examples actually serve to illustrate shortcomings of REP.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00238.x
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00238.x
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectparsimony
dc.subjectgroup support
dc.subjectcladistics
dc.titleIs REP a measure of ‘‘objective support’’?
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución