dc.creatorDecco, Oscar Alfredo
dc.creatorZuchuat, Jésica Itatí
dc.creatorCura, Andrea Cecilia
dc.creatorDecco, Jorgelina Andrea
dc.creatorEngelke, Wilfried
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T16:12:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T07:03:28Z
dc.date.available2021-05-14T16:12:31Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T07:03:28Z
dc.date.created2021-05-14T16:12:31Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.identifierDecco, Oscar Alfredo; Zuchuat, Jésica Itatí; Cura, Andrea Cecilia; Decco, Jorgelina Andrea; Engelke, Wilfried; Conventional extraction vs. enucleation in anterior maxillary sites: a pilot study in humans; e-Century Publishing Corporation; International journal of clinical and experimental medicine; 10; 2; 2-2017; 2147-2155
dc.identifier1940-5901
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/132088
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4358296
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Background: Surgical extraction of ankylosed roots may cause severe defects of the alveolar crest. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of flapless enucleation on the frequency of osteotomy and the maintenance of the alveolar crest width. Method: Ten patients (3 m, 7 f) requiring extractions in the anterior maxil- lary zone were included and randomly treated with conventional extraction and flapless microsurgical enucleation; osteotomy served as rescue technique in both groups. Socket preservation was performed using in situ hardening TCP bone substitute. Results: In the extraction group, 4/10 patients required osteotomy, in the enucleation group 0/10 (P<0.05, chi-square test). The alveolar widths 3 mm below the gingiva before surgery, at 3 and 6 months were 11.50, 8.98, and 9.50 mm in the extraction group and 12.25, 11.35, and 11.25 mm in the enucleation group, re- spectively. Two of 10 control sites and 0 of 10 test sites required augmentation for implant placement. Conclusion: Flapless enucleation combined with socket preservation appears to provide adequate maintenance of alveolar structures for implant placement and may be an alternative for surgical extraction in ankylosed anterior maxillary sites.
dc.languageeng
dc.publishere-Century Publishing Corporation
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.ijcem.com/V10_No2.html
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.ijcem.com/files/ijcem0018259.pdf
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCONVENTIONAL EXTRACTION
dc.subjectFLAPLESS ENUCLEATION
dc.subjectALVEOLAR CREST
dc.subjectSOCKET PRESERVATIONS
dc.titleConventional extraction vs. enucleation in anterior maxillary sites: a pilot study in humans
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución