dc.creatorEsteves Miramont, Alfredo
dc.creatorEsteves, Matias Jose
dc.creatorMercado, Maria Victoria
dc.creatorBarea Paci, Gustavo Javier
dc.creatorGelardi, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T19:41:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T06:37:41Z
dc.date.available2019-11-26T19:41:37Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T06:37:41Z
dc.date.created2019-11-26T19:41:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-10
dc.identifierEsteves Miramont, Alfredo; Esteves, Matias Jose; Mercado, Maria Victoria; Barea Paci, Gustavo Javier; Gelardi, Daniel; Building Shape that Promotes Sustainable Architecture. Evaluation of the Indicative Factors and Its Relation with the Construction Costs; Scientific and Academic Publishing; Architecture Research; 8; 4; 10-2018; 111-122
dc.identifier2168-507X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/90554
dc.identifier2168-5088
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4356125
dc.description.abstractThe energy that the building sector consume including both, the production and operation of buildings are directly proportional to the shape and the thermo-physical properties of the building envelope. The shapes that the architect decides on influences the costs of the construction as well as the energy demands for the life-cycle of the building. The present paper analyse four factors indicated by the bibliography to measure efficiency of the shape of the building. Theserelate different building variables: Envelope Area of Building (Ae), Conditioned Volume (Vc), Floor Area of Building (Ac), Perimeter of Building (Pb). The four factors studied are: Compactness Factor (Ae/Vc); Characteristic Length (Vc/Ae); Compactness Index (Pb/Pc) and Shape Factor (Ae/Ac). This paper also explores the relationship between the SF (shapefactor) and the cost of the construction of the building in relation to floor area, where a high degree of correlation is found, high R2 (<0.89). Therefore, it can be concluded that SF optimizes decisions concerning the shape of building in order to reach lower surface areas (compatible with an aesthetic, harmonic and functional design) that yield the lowest economic and energetic costs of construction.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherScientific and Academic Publishing
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.arch.20180804.01.html
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20180804.01
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBUILDING SHAPE
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE
dc.subjectCONSTRUCTION COSTS
dc.subjectDESIGN TOOLS
dc.titleBuilding Shape that Promotes Sustainable Architecture. Evaluation of the Indicative Factors and Its Relation with the Construction Costs
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución