dc.creatorLoewenstein, David A.
dc.creatorCuriel, Rosie E.
dc.creatorDeKosky, Steven
dc.creatorBauer, Russell M.
dc.creatorRosselli, Monica
dc.creatorGuinjoan, Salvador Martín
dc.creatorAdjouadi, Malek
dc.creatorPeñate, Ailyn
dc.creatorBarker, William W.
dc.creatorGoenaga, Sindy
dc.creatorGolde, Todd
dc.creatorGreig Custo, Maria T.
dc.creatorHanson, Kevin S.
dc.creatorLi, Chunfei
dc.creatorLizarraga, Gabriel
dc.creatorMarsiske, Michael
dc.creatorDuara, Ranjan
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-26T13:24:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T06:17:22Z
dc.date.available2021-07-26T13:24:25Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T06:17:22Z
dc.date.created2021-07-26T13:24:25Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifierLoewenstein, David A.; Curiel, Rosie E.; DeKosky, Steven; Bauer, Russell M.; Rosselli, Monica; et al.; Utilizing semantic intrusions to identify amyloid positivity in mild cognitive impairment; Lippincott Williams; Neurology; 91; 10; 9-2018; E976-E984
dc.identifier0028-3878
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/136905
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4354337
dc.description.abstractObjective Semantic intrusion (SI) errors may highlight specific breakdowns in memory associated with preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD); however, there have been no investigations to determine whether SI errors occur with greater frequency in persons with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) confirmed as amyloid positive (Amy+) vs those who have clinical symptoms of aMCI-AD with negative amyloid scans (suspected non-AD pathology [SNAP]) or persons who are diagnosed with other brain disorders affecting cognition. Methods Eighty-eight participants with aMCI underwent brain amyloid PET and MRI scans and were classified as early AD (Amy+), SNAP (Amy−), or other neurological/psychiatric diagnosis (Amy−). We focused on SI on the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L) targeting proactive semantic interference (PSI; old semantic learning interferes with new semantic learning), failure to recover from PSI after an additional learning trial (frPSI), and retroactive semantic interference (new semantic learning interferes with memory for old semantic learning). Results SIs on measures of PSI and frPSI distinguished between Amy+ AD and SNAP and other non-AD cases. PSI and frPSI intrusions evidenced moderately high associations with reduced volumes in the entorhinal cortex, superior temporal regions, and supramarginal gyrus. No such associations were observed in cases with SNAP. Conclusions SIs on the LASSI-L related to PSI and frPSI uniquely differentiated Amy+ and Amy− participants with aMCI and likely reflect deficits with inhibition and source memory in preclinical AD not captured by traditional cognitive measures. This may represent a specific, noninvasive test successful at distinguishing cases with true AD from those with SNAP.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006128
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://n.neurology.org/content/91/10/e976
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectAlzheimer´s disease
dc.subjectMild cognitive impairment
dc.subjectAmyloid
dc.titleUtilizing semantic intrusions to identify amyloid positivity in mild cognitive impairment
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución