| dc.creator | Pailos, Federico Matias | |
| dc.creator | Tajer, Diego | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-28T15:41:38Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-15T06:13:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-28T15:41:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-15T06:13:59Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2019-03-28T15:41:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-06 | |
| dc.identifier | Pailos, Federico Matias; Tajer, Diego; Validity in a dialetheist framework; Peeters Publishing; Logique Et Analyse; 60; 238; 6-2017; 191-202 | |
| dc.identifier | 0024-5836 | |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72738 | |
| dc.identifier | CONICET Digital | |
| dc.identifier | CONICET | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4354002 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we develop two theories of validity in a dialetheist framework, both based on Meadows (2014). The first one, LPV∗, has LP's consequence relation but the validity predicate of Meadows' fixed point construction. The second theory, DT (the one we favour), is defined in terms of its validity predicate. Therefore, in DT, the validity predicate and the consequence relation coincide. Moreover, this theory, unlike Meadows' VAL, is reflexive. | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Peeters Publishing | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3212073&journal_code=LEA | |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/LEA.238.0.3212073 | |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
| dc.subject | DIALETHEISM | |
| dc.subject | PARACONSISTENCY | |
| dc.subject | VALIDITY | |
| dc.subject | VALIDITY PARADOX | |
| dc.title | Validity in a dialetheist framework | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
