dc.creatorHeinrich, Michael
dc.creatorLardos, Andreas
dc.creatorLeonti, Marco
dc.creatorWeckerle, Caroline
dc.creatorWillcox, Merlin
dc.creatorApplequist, Wendy
dc.creatorLadio, Ana Haydee
dc.creatorLin Long, Chun
dc.creatorMukherjee, Pulok
dc.creatorStafford, Gary
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-21T12:12:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T05:01:01Z
dc.date.available2020-04-21T12:12:15Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T05:01:01Z
dc.date.created2020-04-21T12:12:15Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifierHeinrich, Michael; Lardos, Andreas; Leonti, Marco; Weckerle, Caroline; Willcox, Merlin; et al.; Best practice in research: Consensus Statement on Ethnopharmacological Field Studies. ConSEFS; Elsevier Ireland; Journal of Ethnopharmacology; 211; 1-2018; 329-339
dc.identifier0378-8741
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/103110
dc.identifier1872-7573
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4347570
dc.description.abstractBackground: Ethnopharmacological research aims at gathering information on local and traditional uses of plants and other natural substances. However, the approaches used and the methods employed vary, and while such a variability is desirable in terms of scientific diversity, research must adhere to well defined quality standards and reproducible methods. Objectives: With ConSEFS (the Consensus Statement on Ethnopharmacological Field Studies) we want to define best-practice in developing, conducting and reporting field studies focusing on local and traditional uses of medicinal and food plants, including studies using a historical approach. Methods: After first developing an initial draft the core group invited community-wide feedback from researchers both through a web-based consultation and a series of workshops at conferences during 2017. Outcomes:The consultation resulted in a large number of responses. Feedback was received via a weblink on the Journal of Ethnopharmacology´s website (ca. 100 responses), other oral and written responses (ca. 50) and discussions with stakeholders at four conferences. The main outcome is a checklist, covering best practice for designing, implementing and recording ethnopharmacological field studies and historical studies. Conclusions: Prior to starting ethnopharmacological field research, it is essential that the authors are fully aware of the best practice in the field. For the first time in the field of ethnopharmacology a community-wide document defines guidelines for best practice on how to conduct and report such studies. It will need to be updated and further developed. While the feedback has been based on responses by many experienced researchers, there is a need to test it in practice by using it both in implementing and reporting field studies (or historical studies), and peer-review.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.08.015
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378874117324030
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCONSORT (ADAPTION)
dc.subjectETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL FIELD STUDIES
dc.subjectHISTORICAL STUDIES
dc.subjectMEDICINAL PLANTS
dc.subjectTRADITIONAL MEDICINE
dc.titleBest practice in research: Consensus Statement on Ethnopharmacological Field Studies. ConSEFS
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución