dc.contributorOgata, Kei
dc.creatorSobiesiak, Matheus
dc.creatorValdez Buso, Victoria
dc.creatorKneller, Ben
dc.creatorAlsop, G. Ian
dc.creatorMilana, Juan Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-08T15:10:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T04:49:29Z
dc.date.available2021-02-08T15:10:57Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T04:49:29Z
dc.date.created2021-02-08T15:10:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifierSobiesiak, Matheus; Valdez Buso, Victoria; Kneller, Ben; Alsop, G. Ian; Milana, Juan Pablo; Block Generation, Deformation, and Interaction of Mass‐Transport Deposits With the Seafloor: An Outcrop‐Based Study of the Carboniferous Paganzo Basin (Cerro Bola, NW Argentina); Wiley; 2019; 91-104
dc.identifier9781119500582
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/125106
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4346704
dc.description.abstractMass‐transport processes are notorious for their ability to carry large blocks or megaclasts, to deform sediments, and to interact with the seafloor through deformation and/or erosion of the substrate. These processes, together with their influence on slope sedimentation, are themes we address via direct field observation of three Carboniferous‐aged mass‐transport deposits (MTDs) (labeled I, II, and III) from Cerro Bola, NW Argentina. Internal deformation can be observed in all three MTDs, although it is best developed in MTD II, a 180m thick vertically zoned MTD with deformation evolving upward from a simple shear dominated base to a pure shear middle zone and finally back into a simple shear dominated topmost zone. The contact between MTDs I and II and their underlying sandstone substrates are also locally deformed, with plastic deformation affecting up to ~20m of substrate below the MTD base. Conversely, the basal contact between MTD II and the substrate is also in part erosional, marked by scours and grooves that truncate the bedding in the topmost layers of the substrate. Additionally, the presence of large blocks composed of diverse lithologies embedded within the MTDs, together with the sedimentological description of the MTD?s matrix and the aforementioned interaction with the seafloor, suggests at least two processes accountable for block generation within MTDs.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119500513
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceSubmarine Landslides: Subaqueous Mass Transport Deposits from Outcrops to Seismic Profiles
dc.subjectSubmarine landslides
dc.subjectmass transprot deposit
dc.subjectPaganzo basin
dc.subjectCarboniferous
dc.titleBlock Generation, Deformation, and Interaction of Mass‐Transport Deposits With the Seafloor: An Outcrop‐Based Study of the Carboniferous Paganzo Basin (Cerro Bola, NW Argentina)
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución