dc.creatorVasen, Gustavo
dc.creatorDunayevich, Paula
dc.creatorConstantinou, Andreas
dc.creatorColman Lerner, Alejandro Ariel
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T03:04:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T04:31:16Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T03:04:59Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T04:31:16Z
dc.date.created2021-10-01T03:04:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-20
dc.identifierVasen, Gustavo; Dunayevich, Paula; Constantinou, Andreas; Colman Lerner, Alejandro Ariel; GPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae; Taylor & Francis; Communicative and Integrative Biology; 13; 1; 20-8-2020; 128-139
dc.identifier1942-0889
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/142181
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4345409
dc.description.abstractChemotactic/chemotropic cells follow accurately the direction of gradients of regulatory molecules. Many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) function as chemoattractant receptors to guide polarized responses. In “a” mating type yeast, the GPCR Ste2 senses the α-cell’s pheromone. Previously, phosphorylation and trafficking of this receptor have been implicated in the process of gradient sensing, where cells dynamically correct growth. Correction is often necessary since yeast have intrinsic polarity sites that interfere with a correct initial gradient decoding. We have recently showed that when actively dividing (not in G1) yeast are exposed to a uniform pheromone concentration, they initiate a pheromone-induced polarization next to the mother–daughter cytokinesis site. Then, they reorient their growth to the intrinsic polarity site. Here, to study if Ste2 phosphorylation and internalization are involved in this process, we generated receptor variants combining three types of mutated signals for the first time: phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and the NPFX1,2D Sla1-binding motif. We first characterized their effect on endocytosis and found that these processes regulate internalization in a more complex manner than previously shown. Interestingly, we showed that receptor phosphorylation can drive internalization independently of ubiquitylation and the NPFX1,2D motif. When tested in our assays, cells expressing either phosphorylation or endocytosis-deficient receptors were able to switch away from the cytokinesis site to find the intrinsic polarity site as efficiently as their WT counterparts. Thus, we conclude that these processes are not necessary for the reorientation of polarization.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2020.1806667
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2020.1806667
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectendocytosis
dc.subjectGPCR
dc.subjectpolarization
dc.subjectgradient sensing
dc.titleGPCR receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis are not necessary to switch polarized growth between internal cues during pheromone response in S. cerevisiae
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución