dc.creatorJost, Matthias
dc.creatorNaumann, Julia
dc.creatorRocamundi, Nicolás
dc.creatorCocucci, Andrea Aristides
dc.creatorWanke, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-05T18:15:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T04:26:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-05T18:15:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T04:26:13Z
dc.date.created2020-06-05T18:15:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifierJost, Matthias; Naumann, Julia; Rocamundi, Nicolás; Cocucci, Andrea Aristides; Wanke, Stefan; The first plastid genome of the Holoparasitic Genus Prosopanche (Hydnoraceae); MPDI; Plants; 9; 3; 3-2020
dc.identifier2223-7747
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/106767
dc.identifier2223-7747
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4344999
dc.description.abstractPlastomes of parasitic and mycoheterotrophic plants show different degrees of reduction depending on the plants' level of heterotrophy and host dependence in comparison to photoautotrophic sister species, and the amount of time since heterotrophic dependence was established. In all but the most recent heterotrophic lineages, this reduction involves substantial decrease in genome size and gene content and sometimes alterations of genome structure. Here, we present the first plastid genome of the holoparasitic genus Prosopanche, which shows clear signs of functionality. The plastome of Prosopanche americana has a length of 28,191 bp and contains only 24 unique genes, i.e., 14 ribosomal protein genes, four ribosomal RNA genes, five genes coding for tRNAs and three genes with other or unknown function (accD, ycf1, ycf2). The inverted repeat has been lost. Despite the split of Prosopanche and Hydnora about 54 MYA ago, the level of genome reduction is strikingly congruent between the two holoparasites although highly dissimilar nucleotide sequences are observed. Our results lead to two possible evolutionary scenarios that will be tested in the future with a larger sampling: 1) a Hydnoraceae plastome, similar to those ofHydnora and Prosopanche today, existed already in the most recent common ancestor and has not changed much with respect to gene content and structure, or 2) the genome similarities we observe today are the result of two independent evolutionary trajectories leading to almost the same end point. The first hypothesis would be most parsimonious whereas the second would point totaxon dependent essential gene sets for plants released from photosynthetic constraints.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMPDI
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/3/306
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9030306
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPIPERALES
dc.subjectHYDNORACEAE
dc.subjectPARASITIC PLANTS
dc.subjectPLASTID GENOME
dc.titleThe first plastid genome of the Holoparasitic Genus Prosopanche (Hydnoraceae)
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución