dc.creatorOrensanz, Martín
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-05T18:46:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T04:12:03Z
dc.date.available2019-12-05T18:46:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T04:12:03Z
dc.date.created2019-12-05T18:46:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.identifierOrensanz, Martín; Philosophy of veterinary parasitology; Elsevier Science; Veterinary Parasitology; 263; 11-2018; 73-74
dc.identifier0304-4017
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/91517
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4343838
dc.description.abstract“Philosophy of science without history of science is empty; history of science without philosophy of science is blind.” (Lakatos, 1999: 102). Although this reformulation of Kant’s famous phrase may seem extreme, there is a grain of truth to it. Excellent articles on the history of veterinary parasitology have been published in this journal several decades ago. Coverage was provided for the case of Spain (Del Campillo, 1989), France (Touratier, 1989), Germany and Scandinavia (Enigk and Habil, 1989), the United States (Malone, 1989), and Canada (Slocombe, 1989). Yet none of them explicitly stated what their philosophical underpinnings were, if any. If Lakatos is right, then the lack of a solid philosophical framework hinders historical investigations such as these.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401718303455
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.10.008
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectVeterinary
dc.subjectParasitology
dc.titlePhilosophy of veterinary parasitology
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución