dc.creatorFaraj, Santiago Enrique
dc.creatorRossi, Rolando Carlos
dc.creatorLopez Montes, Mónica Beatriz
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T03:13:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T03:53:36Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T03:13:18Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T03:53:36Z
dc.date.created2021-04-20T03:13:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifierFaraj, Santiago Enrique; Rossi, Rolando Carlos; Lopez Montes, Mónica Beatriz; How to distinguish ligand-binding mechanisms: an example of conformational selection disguised as an induced fit; Inst Biology; Journal Of Biological Education; 10-2019; 1-17
dc.identifier0021-9266
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/130401
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4342383
dc.description.abstractThis report describes the implementation of a laboratory exercise for an advanced biochemistry or enzyme kinetics class at the undergraduate or graduate level, designed to improve understanding of protein conformational changes associated with the binding of a ligand. Students measure the fluorescence changes induced by the conformational transition of a glycoprotein (the Na,K-ATPase) upon addition of different ligands (Pi and BeF3 −) and analyse the results in order to determine the mechanism of the process. The results show that Pi and BeF3 − present opposite effects on the observed rate constants (kobs) with ligand concentration: kobs decreases with [Pi] and increases with [BeF3 −]. This observation, together with the frequently used assumption that binding occurs under rapid equilibrium, led to propose different models for ligand-induced conformational transitions: a conformational selection for Pi and an induced fit for BeF3 −. In this paper, we show that if the rapid-equilibrium approximation for ligand binding is not assumed, a conformational selection mechanism can account for the effects of both ligands. This active-learning exercise serves as the basis for discussing the consequences of not being extremely cautious when invoking approximations about not-very-well-known systems and the importance of a correct understanding of models assigned to chemical processes.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInst Biology
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/3G4X3ZJ7GV8MWYG8Z8BW/full?target=10.1080/00219266.2019.1679657
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1679657
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectCONFORMATIONAL SELECTION
dc.subjectENZYME KINETICS
dc.subjectINDUCED FIT
dc.subjectK-ATPASE
dc.subjectNA
dc.subjectPROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTION
dc.titleHow to distinguish ligand-binding mechanisms: an example of conformational selection disguised as an induced fit
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución