dc.creatorPilosof, Shai
dc.creatorLareschi, Marcela
dc.creatorKrasnov, Boris R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T17:29:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T03:37:26Z
dc.date.available2019-01-30T17:29:42Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T03:37:26Z
dc.date.created2019-01-30T17:29:42Z
dc.date.issued2012-11
dc.identifierPilosof, Shai; Lareschi, Marcela; Krasnov, Boris R.; Host body microcosm and ectoparasite infracommunities: Arthropod ectoparasites are not spatially segregated; Cambridge University Press; Parasitology; 139; 13; 11-2012; 1739-1748
dc.identifier0031-1820
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/69005
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4340823
dc.description.abstractWe studied the distribution of ectoparasite species (an ixodid tick, a chigger mite, 7 mesostigmate mites, 5 fleas and 3 lice) on bodies of 5 species of rodent hosts from the marshlands in Argentina to establish whether arthropod ectoparasites are segregated across body parts of the same host individual. We asked (a) whether an individual ectoparasite species prefers certain parts of the body of its host and, if yes, whether these preferences overlap among ectoparasite species; (b) whether ectoparasite species composition differs among different parts of a host's body; and (c) whether co-occurrences of ectoparasite species within pre-defined body parts of a host are non-random and, if yes, whether ectoparasites co-occur in the same body part of a host either less or more often than expected by chance. It was found that, in general, ectoparasite species were not segregated across body parts of a host. Although some ectoparasites preferred certain body parts, these preferences were similar among ectoparasites belonging to different species and/or higher taxa resulting in similarity among host body parts in ectoparasite species composition. In addition, ectoparasite species demonstrated a tendency to co-occur on the same body parts of a host and not to be segregated among them. It was concluded that the distribution of ectoparasites on the body of a small mammalian host is driven mainly by their interaction with the host rather than by distinct preferences or interactions among ectoparasite species.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/parasitology/article/host-body-microcosm-and-ectoparasite-infracommunities-arthropod-ectoparasites-are-not-spatially-segregated/48D2AC378966195EBA71737AAFCE0116
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012001205
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectBODY PART
dc.subjectCO-OCCURRENCE
dc.subjectECTOPARASITES
dc.subjectGROOMING
dc.subjectRODENTS
dc.subjectSIMILARITY
dc.titleHost body microcosm and ectoparasite infracommunities: Arthropod ectoparasites are not spatially segregated
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución