dc.creatorNoël, Elsa
dc.creatorFruitet, Elise
dc.creatorLelaurin, Dennyss
dc.creatorBonel, Nicolás
dc.creatorSégard, Adeline
dc.creatorSarda, Violette
dc.creatorJarne, Philippe
dc.creatorDavid, Patrice
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-16T02:00:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T03:12:03Z
dc.date.available2020-06-16T02:00:17Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T03:12:03Z
dc.date.created2020-06-16T02:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.identifierNoël, Elsa; Fruitet, Elise; Lelaurin, Dennyss; Bonel, Nicolás; Ségard, Adeline; et al.; Sexual selection and inbreeding: Two efficient ways to limit the accumulation of deleterious mutations; Wiley-Blackwell; Evolution Letters; 3; 1; 2-2019; 80-92
dc.identifier2056-3744
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/107471
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4338686
dc.description.abstractTheory and empirical data showed that two processes can boost selection against deleterious mutations, thus facilitating the purging of the mutation load: inbreeding, by exposing recessive deleterious alleles to selection in homozygous form, and sexual selection, by enhancing the relative reproductive success of males with small mutation loads. These processes tend to be mutually exclusive because sexual selection is reduced under mating systems that promote inbreeding, such as self‐fertilization in hermaphrodites. We estimated the relative efficiency of inbreeding and sexual selection at purging the genetic load, using 50 generations of experimental evolution, in a hermaphroditic snail (Physa acuta). To this end, we generated lines that were exposed to various intensities of inbreeding, sexual selection (on the male function), and nonsexual selection (on the female function). We measured how these regimes affected the mutation load, quantified through the survival of outcrossed and selfed juveniles. We found that juvenile survival strongly decreased in outbred lines with reduced male selection, but not when female selection was relaxed, showing that male‐specific sexual selection does purge deleterious mutations. However, in lines exposed to inbreeding, where sexual selection was also relaxed, survival did not decrease, and even increased for self‐fertilized juveniles, showing that purging through inbreeding can compensate for the absence of sexual selection. Our results point to the further question of whether a mixed strategy combining the advantages of both mechanisms of genetic purging could be evolutionary stable.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/evl3.93
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.93
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectEXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION
dc.subjectHERMAPHRODITE
dc.subjectMUTATION LOAD
dc.subjectPURGING
dc.subjectSELFING
dc.subjectSNAIL
dc.titleSexual selection and inbreeding: Two efficient ways to limit the accumulation of deleterious mutations
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución