dc.creatorJorge, Ricardo E.
dc.creatorLi, Ruosha
dc.creatorLiu, Xiangyu
dc.creatorMcGavin, Jill K.
dc.creatorShorter, Daryl I.
dc.creatorAcion, Laura
dc.creatorArndt, Stephan
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-07T18:28:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T03:10:42Z
dc.date.available2021-10-07T18:28:02Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T03:10:42Z
dc.date.created2021-10-07T18:28:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.identifierJorge, Ricardo E.; Li, Ruosha; Liu, Xiangyu; McGavin, Jill K.; Shorter, Daryl I.; et al.; Treating alcohol use disorder in U.S. veterans: The role of traumatic brain injury; American Neuropsychiatric Association; Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences; 31; 4; 10-2019; 319-327
dc.identifier0895-0172
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/143188
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4338578
dc.description.abstractObjective: The authors examined the efficacy of valproate to reduce relapse to heavy drinking among veterans with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and neuropsychiatric comorbidities and whether antecedent traumatic brain injury (TBI) or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affected treatment response. Methods: Participants were male veterans 18–60 years old with an AUD and no other substance use besides nicotine or cannabis. Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive either valproate or naltrexone. Participants were evaluated at baseline and followed weekly for 24 weeks. All participants received standardized psychosocial interventions as well as treatment for coexistent psychiatric conditions. Results: During the follow-up period, nine study subjects in the naltrexone group and 14 in the valproate group relapsed to heavy drinking, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Participants with a history of moderate to severe TBI were more likely to relapse to heavy drinking compared with those with no TBI (hazard ratio=4.834, 95% CI=1.103–21.194, p=0.033). PTSD status did not significantly affect outcome. Conclusions: Intensive outpatient programs are efficacious alternatives to treat AUD in veterans, although the role of pharmacological treatment is not completely elucidated. Glutamatergic agents appear to be less effective than opiate antagonists to prevent relapse to heavy drinking and to increase cumulative abstinence. Future studies should examine novel pharmacological and nonpharmacological options.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAmerican Neuropsychiatric Association
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18110250
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18110250
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTraumatic Brain Injury
dc.subjectAUD
dc.subjectVeterans
dc.titleTreating alcohol use disorder in U.S. veterans: The role of traumatic brain injury
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución