dc.creatorOrdoñez, Maria de Los Angeles
dc.creatorCassini, Guillermo Hernán
dc.creatorVizcaíno, Sergio Fabián
dc.creatorMarsicano, Claudia Alicia
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-22T17:39:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T02:25:29Z
dc.date.available2020-12-22T17:39:10Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T02:25:29Z
dc.date.created2020-12-22T17:39:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifierOrdoñez, Maria de Los Angeles; Cassini, Guillermo Hernán; Vizcaíno, Sergio Fabián; Marsicano, Claudia Alicia; A geometric morphometric approach to the analysis of skull shape in Triassic dicynodonts (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from South America; Veterinary and Human Toxicology; Journal of Morphology; 280; 12; 12-2019; 1808-1820
dc.identifier0362-2525
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/121057
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4334864
dc.description.abstractDicynodont therapsids were a major component of the Permo-Triassic terrestrial ecosystems across Pangea and have been regarded as specialized herbivores. In South America, the group was represented by several taxa of the clade Kannemeyeriiformes spanning from the Middle to the Late Triassic. In order to evaluate if cranial differences among taxa are potentially related to differences in feeding function, we performed a geometric morphometric analysis on 28 South American dicynodont crania. We digitized 19 cranial landmarks and conducted generalized Procrustes analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), principal component analysis between groups (bg-PCA), and a branch weighted squared-change parsimony approach. Phylogenetic inertia was not a significant driver of cranial shape evolution in the group, whereas PCA and bg-PCA support that major morphological shape differences are concentrated in the preorbital region (relative length of the snout and width of the caniniform process), in the position of quadrate condyle in relation to the caniniform process, and in the increase in the intertemporal surface area. In this context, tusked Dinodontosaurus, “Kannemeyeria,” and Vinceria have relatively smaller adductor attachment areas and input moment arm than younger taxa lacking tusks, such as Ischigualastia, Stahleckeria, and Jachaleria. Differences in cranial morphology in later dicynodonts reflect modifications in feeding mechanics, probably due to changes in food resources (vegetation) in their habitats toward the end of the Triassic.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherVeterinary and Human Toxicology
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jmor.21066
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21066
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectFEEDING FUNCTION
dc.subjectMESOZOIC
dc.subjectSOUTH AMERICA
dc.subjectSYNAPSIDA
dc.titleA geometric morphometric approach to the analysis of skull shape in Triassic dicynodonts (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from South America
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución