dc.creatorLlompart, Facundo Manuel
dc.creatorColautti, Dario César
dc.creatorBaigún, Claudio Rafael M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T19:03:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T02:05:02Z
dc.date.available2020-01-14T19:03:09Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T02:05:02Z
dc.date.created2020-01-14T19:03:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifierLlompart, Facundo Manuel; Colautti, Dario César; Baigún, Claudio Rafael M.; Conciliating artisanal and recreational fisheries in Anegada Bay, Argentina; Elsevier Science; Fisheries Research; 190; 6-2017; 140-149
dc.identifier0165-7836
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/94642
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4333305
dc.description.abstractRecreational and artisanal fisheries are common activities in Latin America often interpreted as competitors due to the use of common-pool resources in coastal areas. Conflicts between the (historical) artisanal fisheries (AF) and recreational fisheries (RF) in Anegada Bay resulted in the prohibition of the former. This study addresses key fisheries characteristics to detect the degree of spatio-temporal overlap between them considering the annual dynamic of the coastal fish assemblage and proposed management alternatives. Both fisheries exerted different fishing effort coinciding with the dynamic of the fish assemblages but partial temporal and spatial overlap where apparent especially during one month. However, both fisheries focused their catches on different target species thus greatly reducing the overlap in resource use. Moreover, the low proportion of juveniles caught, limited fishing effort using selective bottom gillnets and scarce total harvest (168 tonnes/years) for AF compared with those of RF harvest (631 tonnes/years) in Anegada Bay poorly justifies the actual prohibition. However, the vulnerability index of AF landings resulted in higher values than the RF. To resolve conflicts, a co-management including AF, RF and industrial (trawl) stakeholders and non-fishing community is suggested. Because of the economic importance of fishing for local people, an efficient inter and intra-sector communications process and new fisheries guidelines are urgent for the equitable use of fisheries resources without compromising the goals of a protected area.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783617300206
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.01.011
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectANEGADA BAY
dc.subjectCOASTAL FISHERIES
dc.subjectCOMMON-POOL RESOURCES
dc.subjectFISHERIES CONFLICTS
dc.subjectFISHERIES MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectSEA MANAGEMENT
dc.titleConciliating artisanal and recreational fisheries in Anegada Bay, Argentina
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución