dc.creatorDelgado, Ana
dc.creatorSaletti, Lorena
dc.creatorLópez-Fernández, Luis Andrés
dc.creatorToro-Cárdenas, Silvia
dc.creatorLuna del Castillo, Juan de Dios
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-08T17:41:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T02:02:03Z
dc.date.available2019-08-08T17:41:30Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T02:02:03Z
dc.date.created2019-08-08T17:41:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-03
dc.identifierDelgado, Ana; Saletti, Lorena; López-Fernández, Luis Andrés; Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia; Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios; Professional success and gender in family medicine: Design of scales and examination of gender differences in subjective and objective success among family physicians; SAGE Publications; Evaluation & The Health Professions; 39; 1; 3-2016; 87-99
dc.identifier0163-2787
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/81233
dc.identifier1552-3918
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4333038
dc.description.abstractTwo components of professional success have been defined: objective career success (OCS) and subjective career success (SCS). Despite the increasing number of women practicing medicine, gender inequalities persist. The objectives of this descriptive, cross-sectional, and multicenter study were (a) to construct and validate OCS and SCS scales, (b) to determine the relationships between OCS and SCS and between each scale and professional/family characteristics, and (c) to compare these associations between male and female family physicians (FPs). The study sample comprised 250 female and 250 male FPs from urban health centers in Andalusia (Spain). Data were gathered over 6 months on gender, age, care load, professional/family variables, and family–work balance, using a self-administered questionnaire. OSC and SCS scales were examined by using exploratory factorial analysis and Cronbach’s α, and scores were compared by gender-stratified bivariate and multiple regression analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated using a multilevel analysis. The response rate was 73.6%. We identified three OCS factors and two SCS factors. Lower scores were obtained by female versus male FPs in the OCS dimensions, but there were no gender differences in either SCS dimension.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163278714543686
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163278714543686
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectGENDER
dc.subjectOBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS
dc.subjectPRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS
dc.subjectSCALE
dc.subjectSUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS
dc.titleProfessional success and gender in family medicine: Design of scales and examination of gender differences in subjective and objective success among family physicians
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución