dc.creatorPaez Lama, Sebastián Antonio
dc.creatorEgea, Angela Vanina
dc.creatorGrilli, Daniel Guillermo
dc.creatorFucili, Mercedes
dc.creatorAllegretti, Liliana Inés
dc.creatorGuevara, Juan Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-25T21:57:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T00:31:45Z
dc.date.available2019-07-25T21:57:16Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T00:31:45Z
dc.date.created2019-07-25T21:57:16Z
dc.date.issued2013-02
dc.identifierPaez Lama, Sebastián Antonio; Egea, Angela Vanina; Grilli, Daniel Guillermo; Fucili, Mercedes; Allegretti, Liliana Inés; et al.; Growth and economic performance of kid production under different rearing systems and slaughter ages in arid areas of Argentina; Elsevier Science; Journal of Small Ruminant Research; 110; 1; 2-2013; 9-14
dc.identifier0921-4488
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/80341
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4325103
dc.description.abstractThis paper evaluated the growth performance of Criollo kids under three different rearing systems and determine the economic profit of each rearing systems with slaughter at two different ages. Forty-eight kids were distributed randomly into three groups (n=16). Two groups of kids were naturally reared with their mothers, suckling goat milk until weaning at 30 and 45days of age (groups N30 and N45, respectively). In the remaining group, kids were artificially reared on milk replacer until 45days of age (group A45). Between 30 and 90days, all groups were ad libitum offered with a ration of alfalfa hay and ground corn. Kids from each group were slaughtered at 60 (n=8) and 90 (n=8) days old. The growth performance of kids was acceptable achieving average daily gain (ADG) values ranging between 115.9 and 129.5gd-1, with no major differences between rearing systems at the end of the study. The natural rearing systems showed low values of gross return, which ranged from -0.60 to 5.67US$kid-1, while the artificial rearing system was not economically viable due to the high cost of milk replacer and high demand of labor. The price of milk replacer should not exceed 20% of meat value so that artificial rearing becomes economically feasible. The average gross return of the two natural rearing groups slaughtered at 90days (3.96±1.46US$kid-1) was three times higher than the animals slaughtered at 60days (1.25±0.93US$kid-1). On the basis of the economic results it would be advisable to raise the kids naturally with goat milk and increase the age of slaugther, as long as consumers accept these older animals without decreasing the selling price of meat.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.08.005
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448812003586
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
dc.subjectKIDS GROWTH
dc.subjectREARING SYSTEM
dc.titleGrowth and economic performance of kid production under different rearing systems and slaughter ages in arid areas of Argentina
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución