dc.creatorWiebe, Karen L.
dc.creatorCockle, Kristina Louise
dc.creatorTrzcinski, M. Kurtis
dc.creatorEdworthy, Amanda B.
dc.creatorMartin, Kathy
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-27T15:03:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T00:27:25Z
dc.date.available2021-09-27T15:03:02Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T00:27:25Z
dc.date.created2021-09-27T15:03:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.identifierWiebe, Karen L.; Cockle, Kristina Louise; Trzcinski, M. Kurtis; Edworthy, Amanda B.; Martin, Kathy; Gaps and Runs in Nest Cavity Occupancy: Cavity “Destroyers” and “Cleaners” Affect Reuse by Secondary Cavity Nesting Vertebrates; Frontiers Media S.A.; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 8; 6-2020; 1-11
dc.identifier2296-701X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/141583
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4324747
dc.description.abstractMany animals require tree cavities for breeding and these sites may be reused by a diversity of secondary cavity nesters over a timespan of decades. It is unknown whether the reuse of holes changes their desirability as nest sites. We hypothesized that some species, “cavity destroyers,” degrade the quality of holes by filling them with coarse nest material or waste whereas excavating species, “cavity cleaners,” might prolong the use of a hole by removing debris or enlarging the hole. Using data gathered during 22 years from a field study in central British Colombia, we analyzed long-term patterns of cavity occupancy in relation to their sequential use by bird and mammal species, grouped by traits. Patterns of cavity occupancy were variable with 49% of 875 large-sized holes (excavated by northern flickers Colaptes auratus and pileated woodpeckers Dryocopus pileatus) and 19% of 652 smaller-sized holes incorporating runs of sequential use that lasted to 18 years. About 11% of large and 25% of small cavities also had gaps of 3–13 years between occupancies. Mammals, raptors and European starlings, consistent with the hypothesis, were cavity destroyers, occupying cavities as terminal users and before gaps more often than expected by chance. The pattern of occupancy by northern flickers was random in relation to gaps or prior use by other species. Although flickers did not target old holes to clean, neither did they avoid them. Small cavities that were renovated by flickers into larger cavities were reused at twice the rate after renovation. Runs of cavity occupancy that involved only cavity-destroying species were shorter than runs that involved periodic use by flickers, suggesting the woodpecker, through its cleaning and renovation, prolonged the use of such holes. Our study contributes insights on additional ecological factors, namely previous users, that can influence the use and availability of cavities over time.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00205
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2020.00205/full
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCAVITY-NESTER
dc.subjectCOMPETITION
dc.subjectNEST REUSE
dc.subjectTREE CAVITY
dc.subjectWOODPECKER
dc.titleGaps and Runs in Nest Cavity Occupancy: Cavity “Destroyers” and “Cleaners” Affect Reuse by Secondary Cavity Nesting Vertebrates
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución