dc.creatorde Oro, Laura Andrea
dc.creatorBuschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T20:27:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T00:26:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T20:27:15Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T00:26:23Z
dc.date.created2019-08-14T20:27:15Z
dc.date.issued2011-08
dc.identifierde Oro, Laura Andrea; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Degradation of the soil surface roughness by rainfall in two loess soils; Elsevier Science; Geoderma; 164; 1-2; 8-2011; 46-53
dc.identifier0016-7061
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/81605
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4324652
dc.description.abstractThe soil surface roughness is one of the main factors affecting wind erosion. Little is known about the influence of rains on the degradation rate of the soil surface roughness in different tillage systems and soil types. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the dynamics of the oriented (Kr) and the random (Crr) soil surface roughness as affected by three tillage tools: a disk tandem (DT), a lister-bedder (LB) and a drill-hoe (DH), and two rain amounts (7 and 28. mm), in two soil types (an Entic Haplustoll and a Typic Ustipsamment). Measured Kr and Crr decay rates were compared with the predicted data, according to the equations provided by the Revised Wind Erosion Equation (RWEQ). Results indicated that initial Kr values were different in each tillage tool in both soils (LB > DH > DT, p < 0.05), while Crr values were mostly similar. The degradation rate of Kr (ORR) was in general higher in the Ustipsamment than in the Haplustoll and in DT than in DH and LB, in both soils. The degradation rate of Crr (RRR) was affected by the soil type (mostly higher in the Ustipsamment than in the Haplustoll) but not by tillage. Increasing rains degraded Kr and Crr at higher rates in both soils, but Kr degraded relatively less when its initial values were higher (LB < DH < DT). RWEQ equations underestimated the soil surface roughness decay in both studied soils, between 60 and 72% for RRR and between 90 and 97% for ORR. The accumulated rain amounts (CUMR) and rain energy (CUMEI) allowed a good prediction of the relative degradation of the oriented roughness. The relative Kr variation as a function of the initial Kr value varied potential negatively and were different for each soil and rain amounts. These equations may allow the calculation of the degradation rate of the oriented roughness as affected by certain rain amounts and the initial Kr. In view of these results it must be further investigated if a unique equation can be developed for predicting soil surface degradation for different soils and rain amounts.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706111001315
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.05.009
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectRWEQ (REVISED WIND EROSION EQUATION)
dc.subjectSOIL SURFACE ROUGHNESS
dc.subjectWIND EROSION
dc.titleDegradation of the soil surface roughness by rainfall in two loess soils
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución