dc.contributorNiewöhner, Jörg
dc.contributorBruns, Antje
dc.contributorHostert, Patrick
dc.contributorKrueger, Tobias
dc.contributorNielsen, Jonas Ø.
dc.contributorHaberl, Helmut
dc.contributorLauk, Christian
dc.contributorLutz, Juliana
dc.contributorMüller, Daniel
dc.creatorNiewöhner, Jörg
dc.creatorNielsen, Jonas Ø.
dc.creatorGasparri, Nestor Ignacio
dc.creatorGou, Yaqing
dc.creatorHauge, Mads
dc.creatorJoshi, Neha
dc.creatorSchaffartzik, Anke
dc.creatorSejersen, Frank
dc.creatorSeto, Karen C.
dc.creatorShughrue, Chris
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T16:50:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T00:24:47Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T16:50:28Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T00:24:47Z
dc.date.created2020-07-17T16:50:28Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifierNiewöhner, Jörg; Nielsen, Jonas Ø.; Gasparri, Nestor Ignacio; Gou, Yaqing; Hauge, Mads; et al.; Conceptualizing Distal Drivers in Land Use Competition; Springer; 2016; 21-40
dc.identifier978-3-319-33626-8
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/109562
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4324506
dc.description.abstractThis introductory chapter explores the notion of ?distal drivers? in land use competition. Research has moved beyond proximate causes of land cover and land use change to focus on the underlying drivers of these dynamics. We discuss the framework of telecoupling within human?environment systems as a first step to come to terms with the increasingly distal nature of driving forces behind land use practices. We then expand the notion of distal as mainly a measure of Euclidian space to include temporal, social, and institutional dimensions. This understanding of distal widens our analytical scope for the analysis of land use competition as a distributed process to consider the role of knowledge and power, technology, and different temporalities within a relational or systemic analysis of practices of land use competition. We conclude by pointing toward the historical and social contingency of land use competition and by acknowledging that this contingency requires a methodological?analytical approach to dynamics that goes beyond linear cause?effect relationships. A critical component of future research will be a better understanding of different types of feedback processes reaching from biophysical feedback loops to feedback produced by individual or institutional reflexivity.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_2
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_2
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR)
dc.sourceLand Use Competition Ecological: Economic and Social Perspectives
dc.subjectTelecoupling
dc.subjectSocial space
dc.subjectSystemic effects
dc.subjectCompetition as process
dc.subjectPower/knowledge
dc.titleConceptualizing Distal Drivers in Land Use Competition
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución