dc.creatorFernandez Brizuela, Anabel Alejandra
dc.creatorMazza, German Delfor
dc.creatorRodriguez, Rosa Ana
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-02T20:39:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T00:08:11Z
dc.date.available2020-01-02T20:39:03Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T00:08:11Z
dc.date.created2020-01-02T20:39:03Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifierFernandez Brizuela, Anabel Alejandra; Mazza, German Delfor; Rodriguez, Rosa Ana; Thermal decomposition under oxidative atmosphere of lignocellulosic wastes: Different kinetic methods application; Elsevier; Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering; 6; 1; 2-2018; 404-415
dc.identifier2213-3437
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/93312
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4323008
dc.description.abstractCombustion of six lignocellulosic wastes was studied using thermogravimetric analysis. Experimental data were analyzed using different kinetic methods Kissinger, FWO, DAEM linear multiple regression methods and Coast Redfern method. Also, their thermodynamic parameters (ΔG, ΔH, ΔS) were obtained. The activation energy (E) and the pre-exponential factor (A) values calculated by the DAEM, FWO and Kissinger methods were higher than those obtained by the linear multiple regression and Coast Redfern methods. The E values obtained from the Kissinger method are consistent with the range of values obtained by the FWO and DAEM methods and are very near to their average values (between 52.75 and 116.92 kJ/mol for all studied agro-industrial wastes). DAEM and FWO methods provides E and A distributions, detecting multi-step kinetics. However, Kissinger method provides only one E and A values for all heating rates, similar to obtained values applying DAEM and FWO methods. The linear multiple regression method provides the knowledge of kinetic triplets for each studied heating rate, presenting a slower fit than the other methods. On the other hand, Coast Redfern method supplies these triplets and the reaction mechanisms. However, using this method, the obtained E values are very different to the calculated values applying isoconversional methods. Using the last mentioned methods, the models of volume contraction and first order describe the devolatilization and char combustion stages, respectively. The obtained thermodynamic parameters values show that the lignocellulosic wastes combustion has a low reaction favorability.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343717306528
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.013
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectCOMBUSTION
dc.subjectISOCONVERSIONAL AND NON-ISOCONVERSIONAL METHODS
dc.subjectKINETIC BEHAVIOUR
dc.subjectLIGNOCELLULOSIC WASTES
dc.subjectTHERMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS
dc.subjectTHERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS
dc.titleThermal decomposition under oxidative atmosphere of lignocellulosic wastes: Different kinetic methods application
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución