dc.creatorRodriguez Bilella, Pablo Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T19:26:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-15T00:01:29Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T19:26:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-15T00:01:29Z
dc.date.created2022-06-29T19:26:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifierRodriguez Bilella, Pablo Daniel; Strengthening the evaluation of sustainable development interventions: Inputs from a social interfaces analysis and livelihood research; John Wiley and Sons Ltd; Environmental Policy and Governance; 2022; 6-2022; 1-9
dc.identifier1756-9338
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/160833
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4322377
dc.description.abstractSince the Brundtland Commission voiced its call for sustainable development, multiple actors at different levels have been increasingly interested in establishing a means to monitor performance and to assess progress towards sustainable development. Different approaches have been developed and tested, and the key role of a clear conceptual framework for guiding the assessment process has been recognized. An alternative perspective can be offered by the incorporation of a social interface analysis and a livelihoods approach in order to strengthen the evaluation of sustainable development interventions both at the project and strategic level. This paper firstly shows the link between a non-normative approach of governance and the social interface analysis, which is explicitly introduced. Secondly, the notion of sustainable livelihoods is presented as the basis for an approach more interested in the agency of households and communities and their potential, competence, capacities, and strengths, rather than their weaknesses and needs. Thirdly, as the social interface analysis implies that theory is grounded on empirical investigation, the paper introduces a case study in four Andean communities in Central West Argentina, where inputs from the social interface analysis and livelihood research were used in order to assess the impact of an external “community-based” development intervention. Finally, the relevance of the two approaches to foster a more nuanced evaluation of sustainable development interventions is discussed.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2006
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2006
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectDEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS
dc.subjectEVALUATION
dc.subjectGOVERNANCE
dc.subjectSOCIAL INTERFACES ANALYSIS
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS RESEARCH
dc.titleStrengthening the evaluation of sustainable development interventions: Inputs from a social interfaces analysis and livelihood research
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución