dc.creatorAlvarez, Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T21:58:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T23:31:45Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T21:58:35Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T23:31:45Z
dc.date.created2020-08-25T21:58:35Z
dc.date.issued2009-02
dc.identifierAlvarez, Roberto; Predicting average regional yield and production of wheat in the Argentine Pampas by an artificial neural network approach; Elsevier Science; European Journal of Agronomy; 30; 2; 2-2009; 70-77
dc.identifier1161-0301
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/112424
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4319745
dc.description.abstractA regional analysis of the effects of soil and climate factors on wheat yield was performed in the Argentine Pampas in order to obtain models suitable for yield estimation and regional grain production prediction. Soil data from soil surveys and climate data from meteorological records were employed. Grain production information from statistics at county level was integrated at a geomorphological level. The Pampas was divided into 10 geographical units and data from 10 growing season were used (1995-2004). Surface regression and artificial neural networks (ANN) methodologies were tested for analyzing the data. Wheat yield was correlated to soil available water holding capacity (SAWHC) in the upper 100 cm of the profiles (r2 = 0.39) and soil organic carbon (SOC) content (r2 = 0.26). The climate factor with stronger effect on yield was the rainfall/crop potential evapotranspiration ratio (R/CPET) during the fallow and vegetative crop growing cycle periods summed (r2 = 0.31). The phototermal quotient (PQ) during the pre-anthesis period had also a significant effect on yield (r2 = 0.05). A surface regression response model was developed that account for 64% of spatial and interannual yield variance, but this model could not perform a better yield prediction than the blind guess technique. An ANN was fitted to the data that accounted for 76% of yield variability. Comparing predicted versus observed yield a lower RMSE (P = 0.05) was obtained using the ANN than using the regression or the blind guess methods. Regional production estimations performed by the ANN showed a good agreement with observed data with a RMSE equivalent to 7% of the whole surveyed area production. As variables used for the ANN development may be available around 40-60 days before wheat harvest, the methodology may be used for wheat production forecasting in the Pampas.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1161030108000865
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.07.005
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectARGENTINE PAMPAS
dc.subjectWHEAT
dc.subjectYIELD ESTIMATION
dc.titlePredicting average regional yield and production of wheat in the Argentine Pampas by an artificial neural network approach
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución