dc.creatorValdés Hernández, Pedro A.
dc.creatorVon Ellenrieder, Nicolás
dc.creatorOjeda Gonzalez, Alejandro
dc.creatorKochen, Sara Silvia
dc.creatorAlemán Gómez, Yasser
dc.creatorMuravchik, Carlos Horacio
dc.creatorValdés Sosa, Pedro A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-29T19:42:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T23:08:31Z
dc.date.available2020-09-29T19:42:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T23:08:31Z
dc.date.created2020-09-29T19:42:19Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-15
dc.identifierValdés Hernández, Pedro A.; Von Ellenrieder, Nicolás; Ojeda Gonzalez, Alejandro; Kochen, Sara Silvia; Alemán Gómez, Yasser; et al.; Approximate average head models for EEG source imaging; Elsevier Science; Journal of Neuroscience Methods; 185; 1; 15-12-2009; 125-132
dc.identifier0165-0270
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/115109
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4317626
dc.description.abstractWe examine the performance of approximate models (AM) of the head in solving the EEG inverse problem. The AM are needed when the individual’s MRI is not available. We simulate the electric potential distribution generated by cortical sources for a large sample of 305 subjects, and solve the inverse problem with AM. Statistical comparisons are carried out with the distribution of the localization errors. We propose several new AM. These are the average of many individual realistic MRI-based models, such as surface-based models or lead fields. We demonstrate that the lead fields of the AM should be calculated considering source moments not constrained to be normal to the cortex. We also show that the imperfect anatomical correspondence between all cortices is the most important cause of localization errors. Our average models perform better than a random individual model or the usual average model in the MNI space. We also show that a classification based on race and gender or head size before averaging does not significantly improve the results. Our average models are slightly better than an existing AM with shape guided by measured individual electrode positions, and have the advantage of not requiring such measurements. Among the studied models, the Average Lead Field seems the most convenient tool in large and systematical clinical and research studies demanding EEG source localization, when MRI are unavailable. This AM does not need a strict alignment between head models, and can therefore be easily achieved for any type of head modeling approach.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016502700900497X?via%3Dihub
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.09.005
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectAPPROXIMATE HEAD MODEL
dc.subjectAVERAGE
dc.subjectBEM
dc.subjectEEG CUBAN BRAIN MAPPING PROJECT
dc.subjectELECTRODE MEASUREMENT
dc.subjectLEAD FIELD
dc.subjectMNI
dc.subjectSLORETA
dc.subjectTHIN PLATE SPLINE
dc.titleApproximate average head models for EEG source imaging
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución