dc.creator | Grosse, Pablo | |
dc.creator | Kervyn, Matthieu | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-08T15:51:19Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-14T22:07:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-08T15:51:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-14T22:07:25Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-08-08T15:51:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-03 | |
dc.identifier | Grosse, Pablo; Kervyn, Matthieu; Morphometry of terrestrial shield volcanoes; Elsevier Science; Geomorphology; 304; 3-2018; 1-14 | |
dc.identifier | 0169-555X | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81219 | |
dc.identifier | CONICET Digital | |
dc.identifier | CONICET | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4312110 | |
dc.description.abstract | Shield volcanoes are described as low-angle edifices built primarily by the accumulation of successive lava flows. This generic view of shield volcano morphology is based on a limited number of monogenetic shields from Icelandand Mexico, and a small set of large oceanic islands (Hawaii, Galápagos). Here, the morphometry of 158 monogenetic and polygenetic shield volcanoes is analyzed quantitatively from 90-meter resolution SRTM DEMs using the MORVOLC algorithm. An additional set of 24 lava-dominated ?shield-like? volcanoes, considered so far as stratovolcanoes, are documented for comparison. Results show that there is a large variation in shield size (volumes from 0.1 to >1000 km3), profile shape (height/basal width (H/WB) ratios mostly from 0.01 to 0.1), flank slope gradients (average slopes mostly from 1° to 15°), elongation and summit truncation. Although there is no clear-cut morphometric difference between shield volcanoes and stratovolcanoes, an approximate threshold can be drawnat 12° average slope and 0.10 H/WB ratio. Principal component analysis of the obtained database enables to identify four key morphometric descriptors: size, steepness, plan shape and truncation. Hierarchical cluster analysis ofthese descriptors results in 12 end-member shield types, with intermediate cases defining a continuum of morphologies. The shield types can be linked in terms of growth stages and shape evolution, related to (1) magma composition and rheology, effusion rate and lava/pyroclast ratio, which will condition edifice steepness; (2) spatial distribution of vents, in turn related to the magmatic feeding system and the tectonic framework, which will control edifice plan shape; and (3) caldera formation, which will condition edifice truncation. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Science | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169555X17305263 | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.12.017 | |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.subject | Shield volcanoes | |
dc.subject | Shield-like volcanoes | |
dc.subject | Morphometry | |
dc.subject | Hierarchical cluster analysis | |
dc.title | Morphometry of terrestrial shield volcanoes | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |