dc.creatorGimenez, Maria Cecilia
dc.creatorPaz Garcia, Ana Pamela
dc.creatorBurgos Paci, Maximiliano Alberto
dc.creatorReinaudi, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-08T18:50:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T22:03:11Z
dc.date.available2019-08-08T18:50:58Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T22:03:11Z
dc.date.created2019-08-08T18:50:58Z
dc.date.issued2016-04
dc.identifierGimenez, Maria Cecilia; Paz Garcia, Ana Pamela; Burgos Paci, Maximiliano Alberto; Reinaudi, Luis; Range of interaction in an opinion evolution model of ideological self-positioning: Contagion, hesitance and polarization; Elsevier Science; Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications; 447; 4-2016; 320-330
dc.identifier0378-4371
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/81245
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4311742
dc.description.abstractThe evolution of public opinion using tools and concepts borrowed from Statistical Physics is an emerging area within the field of Sociophysics. In the present paper, a Statistical Physics model was developed to study the evolution of the ideological self-positioning of an ensemble of agents. The model consists of an array of L components, each one of which represents the ideology of an agent. The proposed mechanism is based on the "voter model", in which one agent can adopt the opinion of another one if the difference of their opinions lies within a certain range. The existence of "undecided" agents (i.e. agents with no definite opinion) was implemented in the model. The possibility of radicalization of an agent's opinion upon interaction with another one was also implemented. The results of our simulations are compared to statistical data taken from the Latinobarómetro databank for the cases of Argentina, Chile, Brazil and Uruguay in the last decade. Among other results, the effect of taking into account the undecided agents is the formation of a single peak at the middle of the ideological spectrum (which corresponds to a centrist ideological position), in agreement with the real cases studied.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.020
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843711501047X
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectIDEOLOGICAL SELF-POSITIONING
dc.subjectSOCIOPHYSICS
dc.subjectVOTER MODEL
dc.titleRange of interaction in an opinion evolution model of ideological self-positioning: Contagion, hesitance and polarization
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución