dc.creatorRichard, María Inés
dc.creatorKrzemien, Deisy
dc.creatorVido, Valentina
dc.creatorVernucci, Santiago
dc.creatorZamora, Eliana Vanesa
dc.creatorComesaña, Ana
dc.creatorGarcía Coni Bosch, Ana Virginia
dc.creatorIntrozzi, Isabel Maria
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T01:06:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T21:35:49Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T01:06:47Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T21:35:49Z
dc.date.created2021-01-29T01:06:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.identifierRichard, María Inés; Krzemien, Deisy; Vido, Valentina; Vernucci, Santiago; Zamora, Eliana Vanesa; et al.; Cognitive flexibility in adulthood and advanced age: Evidence of internal and external validity; Routledge; Applied Neuropsychology:Adult; 2019; 8-2019; 1-15
dc.identifier2327-9109
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/124127
dc.identifierCONICET Digital
dc.identifierCONICET
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4309319
dc.description.abstractAging causes changes that affect functioning of cognitive processes such as cognitive flexibility (CF). Given it allows changing both behavior and thinking in dynamic contexts, it constitutes an essential trait of adaptive, goal-oriented behavior. Despite its importance, specific techniques to evaluate CF in older adults are lacking. The goal of this article is to describe and comparatively analyze the functioning of CF in a sample of 169 individuals representing three age groups—younger-age, middle-age and advanced-age adults—by obtaining evidence of internal and external validity. Using a correlational and cross-sectional research design, four studies were conducted in order to evaluate construct validity—fulfillment of experimental paradigm criteria and contrast between groups and tests with different methods. In addition to the Fingers Task, the study used the CAMBIOS Cognitive Flexibility Test, TAC’s Conjunction Visual Search Task (which evaluates perceptual inhibition) and a verbal fluency task with changes. The results provide evidence of the functioning of CF in adulthood and advanced age, which has implications for neurocognitive clinical evaluation in these stages of life. Additionally, evidence was obtained in favor of the concurrent validity of the instruments used to measure CF, contributing to the solidity of future studies on this executive function.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23279095.2019.1652176
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1652176
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectADULTHOOD
dc.subjectADVANCED AGE
dc.subjectCOGNITIVE FLEXIBILITY
dc.subjectINTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VALIDITY
dc.titleCognitive flexibility in adulthood and advanced age: Evidence of internal and external validity
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución