A massive experiment on choice blindness in political decisions : confidence, confabulation, and unconscious detection of self-deception

dc.creatorRieznik, Andrés
dc.creatorMoscovich, Lorena
dc.creatorFrieiro, Alan
dc.creatorFigini, Julieta
dc.creatorCatalano, Rodrigo
dc.creatorGarrido, Juan Manuel
dc.creatorÁlvarez Heduan, Facundo
dc.creatorSigman, Mariano
dc.creatorGonzález, Pablo A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T19:50:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-14T19:37:56Z
dc.date.available2018-07-20T19:50:37Z
dc.date.available2022-10-14T19:37:56Z
dc.date.created2018-07-20T19:50:37Z
dc.date.issued207-02-14
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171108
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.utdt.edu/handle/20.500.13098/11062
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4288138
dc.description.abstractWe implemented a Choice Blindness Paradigm containing political statements in Argentina to reveal the existence of categorical ranges of introspective reports, identified by confidence and agreement levels, separating easy from very hard to manipulate decisions. CBP was implemented in both live and web-based forms. Importantly, and contrary to what was observed in Sweden, we did not observe changes in voting intentions. Also, confidence levels in the manipulated replies where significantly lower than in non-manipulated cases even in undetected manipulations. We name this phenomenon unconscious detection of selfdeception. Results also show that females are more difficult to manipulate than men.
dc.relationPLoS ONE 12(2): e0171108
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectToma de decisiones
dc.subjectAnálisis comparativo
dc.subjectComunicación política
dc.titleA massive experiment on choice blindness in political decisions : confidence, confabulation, and unconscious detection of self-deception
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución