Determinants of Economic Growth in Founder Countries of the PA and the ASAN

dc.creatorOsorio Barreto, Daniel
dc.creatorCardona Arenas, Carlos David
dc.creatorParra Sánchez, José Hernán
dc.creatorJiménez Varón, Cristian Felipe
dc.creatorCardona Duque, Juan Manuel
dc.creatorMejía Rubio, Pedro Pablo
dc.date21 de mayo de 2022
dc.date22 de abril de 2022
dc.date2022-09-28T07:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T16:02:02Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T16:02:02Z
dc.identifierhttps://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/eq/vol1/iss39/3
dc.identifierhttps://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1524&context=eq
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4190913
dc.description<p>El objetivo de este artículo es realizar una aproximación desde una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre los determinantes del crecimiento económico desde un enfoque de ciclo virtuoso kaldoriano enfocado en los países fundadores de la Alianza del Pacífico y la Asociación de Naciones del Sudeste Asiático a través de bases de datos como Web of Science y Scopus. Se han identificado dos vacíos de conocimiento. El primero corresponde a la falta de estudios que analicen comparativamente los determinantes kaldorianos del crecimiento económico virtuoso; el segundo está relacionado con la escasez de publicaciones relacionadas con la identificación de la convergencia/divergencia entre países y bloques comerciales, que ningún otro trabajo ha estudiado todavía. Como apartado complementario, se realiza un análisis exploratorio de conglomerados el cual reveló que aquellos formados desde 1990 hasta 2018 se han mantenido.</p>
dc.description<p>The objective of this article is to carry out an approach from a systematic review of the literature and about the determinants of economic growth from a Kaldorian virtuous cycle approach focused on the founder countries of the Pacific Alliance and the Association of Southeast Asia Nations through databases such as Web of Science and Scopus. Two knowledge gaps have been identified. The first corresponds to the lack of studies that comparatively analyze the Kaldorian determinants of virtuous economic growth; the second is the shortage of publications related to the identification of convergence/divergence between countries and trade blocs, which no other paper has yet studied. As a complementary section, the exploratory cluster analysis revealed that the clusters of countries formed from 1990 to 2018 had been maintained.</p>
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formate1431
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Salle. Ediciones Unisalle
dc.relationAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
dc.relationAroche-Reyes, F. (2019). Productive structure and economic growth in Mexico: A multisectoral perspective. Investigacion Economica, 78(309), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.22201/fe.01851667p.2019.309.70117
dc.relationAlmosabbeth, I. A., & Almoree, M. A. (2018). The relationship between manufacturing production and economic growth in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Economic Studies, 45(4), 674-690. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-02-2017-0029
dc.relationAtesoglu, H. S. (1993). Manufacturing and economic growth in the United States. Applied Economics, 25(1), 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849300000114
dc.relationBernat Jr., G. A. (1996). Does manufacturing matter? A spatial econometric view of Kaldor’s laws. Journal of Regional Science, 36(3), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1996.tb01112.x
dc.relationBar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? – A comparison of WoS, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
dc.relationBoggio, L., & Barbieri, L. (2017). International competitiveness in post-Keynesian growth theory: Controversies and empirical evidence. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev067
dc.relationCabral de Lourenço, A. L., & Alves-Cardoso, F. (2018). Economic growth, patterns of specialization and industrialization: a comparative study of BRIC exports (1980-2013). Novos Cadernos Naea, 21(1), 9-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v21i1.5523
dc.relationCantore, N., Clara, M., Lavopa, A., & Soare, C. (2017). Manufacturing as an engine of growth: Which is the best fuel? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2017.04.004
dc.relationCastillo, C. A., Domínguez, C. S., & Castro, G. A. (2019). Quantification of the role of the manufacturing sector in Post Industrial era in European countries. Revista de Economía Mundial, (52), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.v0i52.3918
dc.relationChica, R. (2007). Latinoamérica frente a la globalización: una estrategia alternativa de desarrollo. Universidad Autónoma de Manizales.
dc.relationCiriaci, D., & Palma, D. (2008). The role of knowledge-based supply specialization for competitiveness: A spatial econometric approach. Papers in Regional Science, 87(3), 453-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00198.x
dc.relationDalum, B., Verspagen, B., & Laursen, K. (1999). Does specialization matter for growth? Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(2), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/8.2.267
dc.relationDuque, P., & Cervantes, L. (2019). Responsabilidad Social Universitaria: una revision sistemática y análisis bibliométrico. Estudios Gerenciales, 35(153), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.153.3389
dc.relationDeleidi, M., Paternesi-Meloni, W. P., & Stirati, A. (2019). Tertiarization, productivity, and aggregate demand: evidence-based policies for European countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30(5), 1429-1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00647-6
dc.relationGarcía, J. (2010). Indonesia’s Experience of Agricultural Development: Lessons for Colombia. In J. Vallecilla, El desarrollo agropecuario en Colombia a comienzos del siglo XXI (pp. 151-186). CRECE.
dc.relationGavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal-title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865958
dc.relationGüçlü, M. (2013). Manufacturing and Regional Economic Growth in Turkey: A Spatial Econometric View of Kaldor’s Laws. European Planning Studies, 21(6), 854-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722929
dc.relationGuo, D., Dall’erba, S., & Le Gallo, J. (2013). The Leading Role of Manufacturing in China’s Regional Economic Growth: A Spatial Econometric Approach of Kaldor’s Laws. International Regional Science Review, 36(2), 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017612457779
dc.relationJiménez, F. O. (2017). Growth and premature deindustrialization in Peru 1950-2015: A Kaldorian analysis. Revista Economía, 40(80), 155-222. https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.201702.005
dc.relationKaldor, N. (1961). Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth. In D. C. Hague (Ed.), The Theory of Capital (pp.177-222). Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relationKaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom: an inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relationKaldor, N. (1967). Strategic factors in economic development. Cornell University Press.
dc.relationKaldor, N. (1968). Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industry: A Reply. Economica, 35(140), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.2307/2552347
dc.relationKaldor, N. (1970). The Case for Regional Policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1970.tb00712.x
dc.relationKaldor, N. (1975). Economic Growth and the Verdoorn Law: A Comment on Mr. Rowthorn’s Article. The Economic Journal, 85(340), 891-896. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230633
dc.relationKongsamut, P., Rebelo, S., & Xie, D. (2001). Beyond balanced growth. Review of Economic Studies, 68(4), 869-882. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00193
dc.relationLucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
dc.relationLim, L. K., & McAleer, M. (2002). Economic growth and technological catching up by Singapore to the USA. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 59(1–3), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(01)00401-3
dc.relationMamgain, V. (1999). Are the Kaldor-Verdoorn laws applicable in the newly industrializing countries? Review of Development Economics, 3(3), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00069
dc.relationMarcon, N., de Borja Reis, C. F., & de Araújo, E. C. (2016). Manufacturing and economic development: The actuality of Kaldor’s first and second laws. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 37, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2015.12.002
dc.relationMagacho, G. R., & McCombie, J. S. L. (2017). Verdoorn’s law and productivity dynamics: An empirical investigation into the demand and supply approaches. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(4), 600-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2017.1299580
dc.relationMcCausland, W. D., & Theodossiou, I. (2012). Is manufacturing still the engine of growth? Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 35(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477350105
dc.relationMillemaci, E., & Ofria, F. (2016). Supply and demand-side determinants of productivity growth in Italian regions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 37, 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2016.04.001
dc.relationMoreno, A. M. (2008). Kaldor endogenous economic development laws: the Colombian case. Revista de Economía Institucional, 10(18), 129-147.
dc.relationNassif, A., Feijo, C., & Araujo, E. (2018). Econometric Estimation of Labor Productivity in the Brazilian Manufacturing Sector in the 2000s: a Kaldorian Approach. Revista Brasileira de Inovacao, 17(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v17i1.8650856
dc.relationNecmi, S. (1999). Kaldor’s growth analysis revisited. Applied Economics, 31(5), 653-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499324093
dc.relationPons-Novell, J., & Viladecans-Marsal, E. (1999). Kaldor’s laws and spatial dependence: Evidence for the European Regions. Regional Studies, 33(5), 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950081284
dc.relationRasiah, R. (1996). Manufacturing as an engine of growth and industrialization in Malaysia. Managerial Finance, 22(5), 87-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb018566
dc.relationRocha, I. L. (2018). Manufacturing as a driver of economic growth. PSL Quarterly Review, 71(285), 103-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3211881
dc.relationRomer, P. M. (1990) Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
dc.relationRomero, J. P., & McCombie, J. S. L. (2016). Differences in increasing returns between technological sectors A panel data investigation using the EU KLEMS database. Journal of Economic Studies, 43(5), 863-878. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-03-2015-0045
dc.relationSánchez, I. L. (2011). Economic stagnation in Mexico, manufactures and increasing returns: A kaldorian approach. Investigación Económica, 70(277), 87-126.
dc.relationSánchez-Juárez, I. L., Salas, E., Moreno-Brid, J. C., & Loría Díaz de Guzmán, E. (2019). Kaldorian explanation of low economic growth in Mexico. Problemas del Desarrollo, 50(196), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2019.196.63506
dc.relationSolow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
dc.relationSsozi, J. and Bbaale, E. (2019). The Effects of the Catch-Up Mechanism on the Structural Transformation of Sub-Saharan Africa. Economies, 7(4), 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7040111
dc.relationTregenna, F. (2009). Characterizing deindustrialization: An analysis of changes in manufacturing employment and output internationally. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(3), 433-466. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben032
dc.relationUsui, N. (1997). Dutch disease and policy adjustments to the oil boom: A comparative study of Indonesia and Mexico. Resources Policy, 23(4), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4207(97)00023-8
dc.relationYoung, A. A. (1928). Increasing Returns and Economic Progress. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224097
dc.relationYu, Q., Qi, Z., & Yu, Y. (2018). Industrialization and economic growth in China: A panel test of Kaldor’s growth laws. In 2018 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE) (pp. 382–389). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2018.8745087
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectCrecimiento económico
dc.subjectleyes de Kaldor
dc.subjectindustrialización
dc.subjectcambio estructural
dc.subjectEconomic Growth, Kaldor Laws, Industrialization, Structural Change
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectGrowth and Development
dc.subjectSocial and Behavioral Sciences
dc.titleDeterminants of Economic Growth in Founder Countries of the PA and the ASAN
dc.typeArtículo de investigación
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.19052/eq.vol1.iss39.3
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.coarversionVersión publicada
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de La Salle
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Ciencia Unisalle
dc.identifier.repo.urlrepourl:https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/
dc.relation.ispartofcitationissue39
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEquidad y Desarrollo
dc.title.translatedDeterminantes de crecimiento económico en los países fundadores de la Alianza del Pacífico y la Asociación de Países del Sudeste Asiático: aproximación desde una revisión sistemática de literatura


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución