dc.creator | Rey-Rodríguez, Diana V. | |
dc.creator | Leguizamón-Stevenson, Anamaría | |
dc.creator | García-Lozada, Diana | |
dc.date | 19 de octubre 2021 | |
dc.date | 7 de diciembre de 2021 | |
dc.date | 2022-02-15T08:00:00Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-13T15:41:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-13T15:41:07Z | |
dc.identifier | https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/svo/vol19/iss2/6 | |
dc.identifier | https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1480&context=svo | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4186710 | |
dc.description | El propósito del presente artículo es evaluar la concordancia entre las medidas del fotorefractómetro portátil Plusoptix A12C y el autorefractómetro de mesa POTEC PRK-6000. Se evaluó la refracción objetiva sin cicloplejia en 99 participantes. La concordancia se interpretó con el coeficiente de correlación y concordancia de Lin (CCC), y los límites de acuerdo de Bland y Altman (LdA). Como resultados, se pudo observar que —en un escenario en el que la mediana de la edad de los sujetos fue de 21 años (rango 18 a 41) y 74,8 % fueron de sexo femenino, con el autorefractómetro— se obtuvo que el 73,7 % eran ojos miopes y 14,1 % hipermétropes. En tanto, según lo observado con el fotorefractómetro, el 45,5 % padecía miopía y el 14,1 % hipermetropía. Se identificaron diferencias estadística y clínicamente significativas en el equivalente esférico (diferencia de medianas -0,56, p=0,0041) (LdA 95 % -2,57-1,63). La mayor concordancia se halló en J0 global CCC 0,90 (IC 95 % 0,86-0,94), en miopes CCC 0,90 (IC 95 % 0,85-0,94), en hipermétropes CCC 0,94 (IC 95 % 0,86-1,00) y en >20 años CCC 0,91 (IC 95 % 0,87-0,95). El grado de acuerdo global fue bajo para J45 0,20 IC95 % (0,02-0,38). Los LdA mostraron importante variabilidad en los resultados refractivos de ambos equipos. Se concluyó que el equivalente esférico es de mayor valor negativo con el autorefractómetro POTEC PRK-6000. Existe mayor concordancia para J0 y menor para J45. Los pocos casos de hipermetropía en la muestra estudiada limitan la generalización de las conclusiones relacionadas con ese error de refracción. | |
dc.description | The purpose of this article is to evaluate the agreement between the measurements of the Plusoptix A12C portable photorefractometer and the POTEC PRK-6000 benchtop autorefractometer. Objective refraction without cycloplegia was evaluated in 99 participants. Agreement was interpreted with Lin’s correlation and concordance coefficient (CCC), and Bland and Altman’s limits of agreement (LoA). As results, it could be observed that -in a scenario in which the median age of the subjects was 21 years (range 18 to 41) and 74.8% were female, with the autorefractometer- 73.7% were myopic eyes and 14.1% were hyperopic. Meanwhile, as observed with the photorefractometer, 45.5% were myopic and 14.1% hyperopic. Statistically and clinically significant differences were identified in the spherical equivalent (median difference -0.56, p=0.0041) (LdA 95% -2.57-1.63). The highest agreement was found in global J0 CCC 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.94), in myopes CCC 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), in hyperopes CCC 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-1.00) and in >20 years CCC 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.95). The overall degree of agreement was low for J45 0.20 CI95% (0.02-0.38). The LdA showed significant variability in refractive outcomes for both teams. It was concluded that the spherical equivalent is of higher negative value with the POTEC PRK-6000 autorefractometer. There is higher agreement for J0 and lower for J45. The few cases of hyperopia in the sample studied limit the generalization of the conclusions related to this refractive error. | |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.format | 43 - 53 | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de La Salle. Ediciones Unisalle | |
dc.relation | Mirzajani A, Qasemi F, Asharlous A, Yekta A, Doostdar A, Khabazkhoob M, et al. Are the results of handheld auto-refractometer as valid as the result of table-mounted refractometer? Jour Curr Ophthal. 2019;31(3): 305-11. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2018.10.012 | |
dc.relation | Vilaseca M, Arjona M, Pujol J, Peris E, Martínez V. Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults: comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor. Internat Jour Ophthal. 2013;6(5): 618-625. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.05.12 | |
dc.relation | PRL-6000 Auto Ref-Keratometer [Internet]. 2008 [Citado el 27 de octubre de 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.potec.biz/bbs/prk_en.php?wr_id=50 | |
dc.relation | Singman E, Matta N, Tian J, Brubaker A, Silbert D. A Comparison of the PlusoptiX S04 and A09 Photoscreeners. Strabismus. 2013;21(2): 85-87. | |
dc.relation | Bogdănici CM, Săndulache CM, Vasiliu R, Obadă O. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix. Rom Jour Ophthal. 2016;60(4): 249-254. | |
dc.relation | Plusoptix GmbH. Mobile Binocular Autorefractor. User Manual. Alemania: Plusoptix; 2019. | |
dc.relation | Prabakaran S, Fan Q, Wong T-, Saw S-, Dirani M, Chia A, et al. Cycloplegic refraction in preschool children: Comparisons between the hand-held autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2009;29: 422-426. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00616.x | |
dc.relation | Baban T, Sammouh F, Ballouz H, Warrak E. A Comparison of Automated Refractions Using Plusoptix S04 Photoscreener, Nidek AR-20 Handheld Autorefractor and Nidek ARK-510A Auto Ref-Keratometer. JOJ Ophthalmology. 2017;2(4). Disponible en: https://juniperpublishers.com/jojo/pdf/JOJO.MS.ID.555594.pdf | |
dc.relation | Matta NS, Arnold RW, Singman EL, Silbert DI. Comparison Between the plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners. Arch Ophthal (1960). 2009;127(12): 1591-1595. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.294 | |
dc.relation | Yan X, Jiao W, Li Z, Xu W, Li F, Wang L. Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic. PloS one. 2015;10(6): e0126052. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126052 | |
dc.relation | Ying G, Maguire MG, Taylor Kulp M, Ciner E, Moore B, Pistilli M, et al. Comparison of cycloplegic refraction between Grand Seiko autorefractor and Retinomax autorefractor in the Vision in Preschoolers–Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Study. Jour AAPOS. 2017;21(3): 219-223.e3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528993/ | |
dc.relation | Akil H, Keskin S, Çavdarli C. Comparison of the Refractive Measurements with Hand-held Autorefractometer, Table-mounted Autorefractometer and Cycloplegic Retinoscopy in Children. Kor Jour Ophthal. 2015;29(3): 178-184. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2015.29.3.178 | |
dc.relation | Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB, Jong M, Naidoo K, Ohno-Matsui K, et al. IMI – Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2019;60(3): M20-30. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25957 | |
dc.relation | García Lozada DG. Retinoscopía estática: variabilidad interobservadores entre docentes y estudiantes de optometría en una institución universitaria de Bogotá D.C. [Artículo de investigación]. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario; 2010. Disponible en: http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/1801 | |
dc.relation | Cortés-Reyes E, Rubio-Romero JA, Gaitán-Duarte H. Métodos estadísticos de evaluación de la concordancia y la reproducibilidad de pruebas diagnósticas. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2010;61(3): 247-255. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.271 | |
dc.relation | Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2): 135-160. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204 | |
dc.relation | Horwood AM, Riddell PM. Receding and Disparity Cues Aid Relaxation of Accommodation. Optom Vis Scie. 2009;86(11): 1276-1286. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181bb41de | |
dc.relation | Won JY, Shin HY, Kim SY, Lee YC. A comparison of the Plusoptix S09 with an autorefractometer of noncycloplegics and cycloplegics in children. Medicine. 2016;95(35): e4596. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004596 | |
dc.relation | Saini V, Raina U, Gupta A, Goyal J, Anjum R, Saini P, et al. Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group. Ind Jour Ophthal. 2019;17(10): 1555-1559. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1465_18 | |
dc.relation | Payerols A, Eliaou C, Trezeguet V, Villain M, Daien V. Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia. BMC ophthalmology. 2016;16(1): 72. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0247-8 | |
dc.relation | marlin_lancet327_310. | |
dc.relation | Arici C, Türk A, Keskin S, Ceylan OM, Mutlu FM, Hİ. Effect of cycloplegia on refractive errors measured with three different refractometers in school-age children. Turk J Med Sci. 2012;42(4): 657-665. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1104-44 | |
dc.relation | Morgan IG, Iribarren R, Fotouhi A, Grzybowski A. Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for epidemiological studies. Acta Ophthalmologica (Oxford, England). 2015;93(6): 581-585. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12642 | |
dc.relation | Krantz EM, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BEK, Klein R, Huang G, Nieto FJ. Measuring Refraction in Adults in Epidemiological Studies. Archives of Ophthalmology (1960). 2010;128(1): 88-92. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.349 | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights | Acceso abierto | |
dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
dc.subject | Errores de refracción | |
dc.subject | reproducibilidad de los resultados | |
dc.subject | optometría | |
dc.subject | adulto | |
dc.subject | Refractive errors, reproducibility of results, optometry, adult | |
dc.title | Concordancia entre el fotorefractómetro Plusoptix A12C y el autorefractómetro POTEC PRK-6000 para la identificación de errores de refracción en jóvenes | |
dc.type | Artículo de investigación | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.19052/sv.vol19.iss2.6 | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | |
dc.type.content | Text | |
dc.type.coarversion | Versión publicada | |
dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |
dc.relation.citationstartpage | 43 | |
dc.relation.citationendpage | 53 | |
dc.identifier.instname | instname:Universidad de La Salle | |
dc.identifier.reponame | reponame:Ciencia Unisalle | |
dc.identifier.repo.url | repourl:https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/ | |
dc.relation.ispartofcitationissue | 2 | |
dc.relation.ispartofcitationvolume | 19 | |
dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Ciencia y Tecnología para la Salud Visual y Ocular | |
dc.title.translated | Concordance between the Plusoptix A12C Photorefractometer and the POTEC PRK-6000 Autorefractometer for the identification of Refractive Errors in Young People | |