Evaluación del comportamiento productivo de pollos Cobb 500 sometidos a restricción alimenticia como estrategia sostenible de control nutricional

dc.creatorUzcátegui-Varela, Juan Pablo
dc.creatorCollazo-Contreras, Karen Dayana
dc.creatorGuillén-Molina, Edilmer Antonio
dc.date23 de agosto de 2019
dc.date26 de septiembre de 2019
dc.date2020-02-27T08:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T14:26:06Z
dc.date.available2022-10-13T14:26:06Z
dc.identifierhttps://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/mv/vol1/iss39/9
dc.identifierhttps://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1353&context=mv
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4169509
dc.descriptionSe empleó un diseño completamente al azar, distribuyendo 200 pollitos Cobb 500, con aspecto saludable, de un día de edad y peso promedio de 37.34 ± 0.44 g; en cinco grupos con cuatro réplicas de diez polluelos cada una. Durante los 42 días del experimento, las aves recibieron manejo zootécnico tradicional que incluyó dieta comercial isoproteíca (20 % proteína cruda) e isocalórica (3100 kilocaloría (kcal)/kilogramo (kg)). El día 15, la parvada recibió un programa de restricción alimenticia (PRA) según los tratamientos (T) = T0 = consumo ad libitum de alimento concentrado (AC) durante 24 horas (h), T1 = eliminación del AC durante 12 h (20:00-8:00), T2 = supresión de AC por 14 h (18:00-8:00), T3 = 16 h sin acceso a AC (16:00-8:00) y T4 = privación de AC durante 18 h (14:00 y 8:00). Después del día 30, las aves retomaron el libre consumo de AC. Se consideró la ganancia total de peso (GTP), la ganancia diaria de peso (GDP), el consumo de alimento (CA), el factor de conversión alimenticia (FCA), el rendimiento en canal (RC) y la mortalidad (M) como variables respuesta. El análisis estadístico reveló que el PRA no tuvo efecto significativo (p > 0.05) sobre los indicadores productivos evaluados en T0, T1, T2 y T3; sin embargo, el CA fue significativamente menor (p < 0.05) en T3 y T4 comparado con los demás tratamientos. Además, solamente el T4 mostró un FCA menor (p < 0.05) en comparación con los demás tratamientos. Se concluye que un PRA de 18 h durante los días 15 al 30 de edad, favorece los criterios de sostenibilidad al no impactar negativamente en la productividad de las aves
dc.descriptionA fully random design was used to distribute 200 Cobb 500 chickens. They were one day old, looked healthy and had an average weight of 37.34 ± 0.44 g. It consisted in five groups with four replicas having 10 chickens each. During the 42 experimental days, the birds received a traditional zootechnical management including commercial isoproteic diet (20% raw protein) and an isocaloric diet (3,100 kilocalories (kcal)/kilogram (kg)). On day 15, the herd was subject to a feeding restriction program (PRA) according to these treatments (T): T0 ad libitum consumption of concentrated food (CF) for 24 hours (h), T1 removal of the CF for 12 h (20:00-8:00), T2 removal of AC for 14 h (18:00-8:00), T3 16 h with not access to the CF (16:00-8:00), and T4 lack of AC for 18 h (14:00 y 8:00). After day 30, the birds returned to the free consumption of CF. The total weight gain (TWG), daily weight gain (DWG), food consumption (FC), dietary conversion factor (DCF), channel performance (CP), and mortality (M) were taken as response variables. The statistical analysis showed that the PRA had a significant effect on the (P>0.05) on the production indicators evaluated in T0, T1, T2 and T3. However, the CF was significantly lower (p<0,05) in T3 and T4 as compared to the other treatments. In addition, only T4 showed a lower DCF (p<0,05) as compared to the other treatments. It is concluded that a PRA of 18 hours from 15 to 30 days of age favors the sustainability criteria as it does not impact negatively the bird productivity
dc.descriptionO delineamento foi inteiramente aleatório, distribuindo 200 pintos Cobb 500, com aparência saudável, de um dia de idade e peso médio de 37,34 ± 0,44 g. em cinco grupos com quatro réplicas de dez pintainhos cada uma. Durante os 42 dias do experimento, as aves receberam manejo zootécnico tradicional que incluiu dieta comercial isoproteíca (20% proteína bruta) e isocalórica (3.100 quilocaloria (kcal)/quilograma (kg)). No dia 15, os filhotes receberam um programa de restrição alimentar (PRA) de acordo com os tratamentos (T): T0: consumo ad libitum de alimento concentrado (AC) durante 24 horas (h), T1: eliminação do AC durante 12 h (20:00-8:00), T2: supressão de AC por 14 h (18:00-8:00), T3: 16 h sem acesso a AC (16:00-8:00) e T4: privação de AC durante 18 h (14:00 e 8:00). Após o dia 30, as aves retomaram o consumo livre de AC. O ganho total de peso (GTP), ganho diário de peso (GDP), consumo de alimento (CA), fator de conversão alimentar (FCA), rendimento em carcaça (RC) e mortalidade (M) foram considerados como variáveis resposta. A análise estatística revelou que o PRA não teve efeito significativo (P>0.05) sobre os indicadores produtivos avaliados em T0, T1, T2 e T3; no entanto, o CA foi significativamente menor (p<0,05) em T3 e T4 comparado com os outros tratamentos. Além disso, só o T4 mostrou um FCA menor (p<0,05) em comparação com os outros tratamentos. Conclui-se que um PRA de 18 h durante os dias 15 a 30 de idade, favorece os critérios de sustentabilidade por não impactar negativamente na produtividade das aves
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format85 - 97
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Salle. Ediciones Unisalle
dc.relationSokolowicz Z, Herbut E, Krauczyk J. Poultry production and strategy for sustainable developmet of rural areas. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2009; 9(2): 10717.Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3834/217294397f8a5c2c483e94cf875f5d4c05eb.pdf
dc.relationThornton P. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1554): 285367. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
dc.relationKronenberg J. Environmental Impacts of the Use of Ecosystem Services: CaseSstudy of Birdwatching. J. Environ. Manage. 2014; 54:617-30. Recuperado de https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-014-0317-8
dc.relationAmao S, Ojedapo L, Oso O. Evaluation of two commercial broiler strains differing in efficiency of feed utilization. J. New Sci. 2015;14(1): 432-7. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291514851_Evaluation_of_two_commercial_broiler_strains_differing_in_efficiency_of_feed_utilization
dc.relationRamão IB, Nunes RV, Bruno LDG, Tsutsumi CY, Silva WTM, Pozza MSS. Evaluation of different pre-slaughter light intensities and fasting duration in broilers. Braz. J. Poultry Sci. 2011;13(4):235-40. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbca/v13n4/v13n4a03.pdf
dc.relationTallentire C, Leinonen I, Kyriazakis I. Artifcial selection for improved energy efciency is reaching its limits in broiler chickens. J. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8(1168): 1-10. Recuperado de https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-19231-2
dc.relationDe Verdal H, Narcy A, Bastianelli D, Chapuis H, Même N, Urvoix S, et al. Improving the efficiency of feed utilization in poultry by selection. 1. Genetic parameters of anatomy of the gastro-intestinal tract and digestive efficiency. BMC Genet. 2011; 12(59): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-59
dc.relationEl-Wahab A, Visscher C, Kamphues J. Impact of different dietary protein sources on performance, litter quality and footpad dermatitis in broilers. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2018;27(2):148-54. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/90696/2018
dc.relationCarvalho E, Zilli J, Mendes A, Morello G, Bonamigo D. Main factors that affect the economic efficiency of broiler breeder production. Braz. J. Poultry Sci. 2015; 17(1): 111-17. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-635x170111-16
dc.relationSefeedpari P, Rafiee S, Akram A. Identifying sustainable and efficient poultry farms in the light of energy use efficiency: a Data envelopment analysis approach. J. Agric. Eng. Biotec. 2013;1(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.18005/JAEB0101001
dc.relationFreitas D, Vieira S, Angel C, Favero A, Maiorka A. Performance and nutrient utilization of broilers fed diets supplemented with a novel mono-component protease. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2011; 20:32234. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00295
dc.relationSahraei M. Feed restriction in broiler chickens production: a review. Global Vet. 2012;8(5):449-58. Recuperado de https://www.idosi.org/gv/GV8(5)12/4.pdf
dc.relationSugeta S, Giachetto P, Malheiros E, Macari M, Furlan R. Efeito da restrição alimentar quantitativa sobre o ganho compensatório e composição da carcaça de frangos. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 2002;37(7):903-8. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n7/10792.pdf
dc.relationZhan X, Wang M, Ren H, Zhao R, Li J, Tan Z. Effect of early feed restriction on metabolic programming and compensatory growth in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 2007;86(4):654-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.4.654
dc.relationHassanein H, Esmail Z, Abdel-Wareth A. Effects of fasting period and enzyme supplementation on performance and some physiological responses of broiler chickens. Egypt. Poult. Sci. 2011;31(II):453-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227344645_EFFECTS_OF_FASTING_PERIOD_AND_ENZYME_SUPPLEMENTATION_ON_PERFORMANCE_AND_SOME_PHYSIOLOGICAL_RESPONSES_OF_BROILER_CHICKENS
dc.relationCorría de Morais B, Araújo D, Rodrigues J, D' Avila HJ. Effect of early feed restriction on body weight and compensatory growth in Label Rouge broiler chickens. Acta Agron. 2017;66(4):606-11. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169952658022
dc.relationJaramillo A, Rodríguez E, Piraquive A, Cristiano LM, Vacca JA. Evaluación de la restricción alimenticia y su efecto en la ascitis aviar en dos líneas genéticas de pollos de engorde en la Sabana de Bogotá. Rev. Siembra CBA 2017;1:31-43. Recuperado de http://revistas.sena.edu.co/index.php/Revsiembracba/article/view/1868
dc.relationPerozo F, Nava J, Rivera S, Vale O, Arrieta D, Mavárez Y. Evaluación de dos planes de vacunación contra la enfermedad de Newcastle en pollos de engorde de la línea Ross criados bajo condiciones de campo en el Estado Zulia, Venezuela. 2. Respuesta inmune y protección ante un desafío experimental. Rev. Científ. FCV-LUZ. 2004;XIV(5):387-94. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/959/95914502.pdf
dc.relationGómez R, Cortés A, López C, Ávila E. Evaluación de tres programas de alimentación para pollos de engorda con base en dietas sorgo-soya con distintos porcentajes de proteína. Vet. Méx. 2011;42(4):299-309. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42321608005
dc.relationTrómpiz J, Gómez A, Rincón H, Ventura M, Bohórquez N, García A. Efecto de raciones con harina de follaje de yuca sobre el comportamiento productivo en pollos de engorde. Rev. Científ. FCV-LUZ. 2007; XVII (2):143-149
dc.relationJahanpour H, Seidavi A, Qotbi A, Van Den Hoven R, Rocha S, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V. Effects of the level and duration of feeding restriction on carcass components of broilers. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2015;58:99105. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-99-2015
dc.relationCastro J, Contreras C, Marcos E, Silveira M. Jejum alimentar na qualidade da carne de frangos de corte criados em sistema convencional. Ciência Rural. 2008; 38(2): 470-6. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000200028
dc.relationTrómpiz J, Villamide M, Ferrer A, Arenas L, Jeréz N, Sandoval L. Dietas con follaje de yuca y su efecto sobre las características al sacrificio y rendimiento en canal y en cortes de pollos de engorde. Rev. Científ. FCV-LUZ. 2010; XX (3): 293-299
dc.relationSchiavone A, Dabbou S, De Marco M, Cullere M, Biasato I, Biasibetti E, et al. Black soldier fly larva fat inclusion in finisher broiler chicken diet as an alternative fat source, J. Anim. 2018;12(10):2032-2039. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003743
dc.relationAdino S, Wondifraw Z, Addis M. Replacement of Soybean Grain with Cowpea Grain (Vigna unguiculata) as Protein Supplement in Sasso x Rir Crossbred Chicks Diet. Poult. Fish. Wildl. Sc. 2018; 6(1): 1-6
dc.relationEmbaye T, Ameha N, Yusuf Y. Effect of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) grain on growth performance of Cobb 500 broiler chickens. Int. J. Livest. Prod. 2018; 9(12): 326-333. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2017.0424
dc.relationAOAC. Association of Analytical Chemists. Animal feed. Official Methods of Analysis (15a Ed.). The Association. Washington DC., USA. 1990. 1018 pp
dc.relationKyntäjä S, Partanen K, Siljander-Rasi H, Jalava T. Tables of composition and nutritional values of organically produced feed materials for pigs and poultry. MTT Creates Vitality Through Science Report. 2014; 164: 1-39. Recuperado de http://www.mtt.fi/mttraportti/pdf/mttraportti164.pdf
dc.relationDonald H. Animal breeding: contributions to the efficiency of livestock production. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1973; 267: 131-44. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2417280
dc.relationAdhikari T. Phytometallophore-Mediated nutrient acquisition by plants. In: Nutrient use efficiency: from basics to advances. Rakshit, A., Bahadur, H., Sen, A. (Eds.) India: Springer; 2015. p. 403
dc.relationAlkhair S, Ahmed N, Ismail I, Alkurdi O. The effect of limiting feeding time by three and six hours per day during the starter period on broiler performance. Int. J. Livest. Prod. 2017; 8(8): 125-30. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2016.0329
dc.relationZubair A, Leeson S. Compensatory growth in the broiler chicken: a review. World Poultry Sci. J. 1996. 52(2): 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19960015
dc.relationSugiharto S, Henckel P, Lauridsen C. Compensatory growth and fat parameters on broiler fasted in early life. J.Indonesian Trop.Anim.Agric. 2010; 35(4): 239-44. Recuperado de https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/93100-EN-compensatory-growth-and-fat-parameters-o.pdf
dc.relationButzen F, Ribeiro M, Vieira M, Kessler A, Dadalt J, Della P. Early feed restriction in broilers. IPerformance, body fraction weights, and meat quality. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2013; 22(2): 251-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00639
dc.relationGarcía R, Villanueva V, Cepeda D, Padrón E. Comportamiento de pollos bajo restricción alimenticia. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 1997; 5(Supl.1): 319-20. Recuperado de http://avpa.ula.ve/congresos/ALPA97/NM25.pdf
dc.relationHenn J, Bockor L, Ribeiro A, Coldebella A, Kessler A. Growth and deposition of body components of intermediate and high performance broilers. Braz. J. Poultry Sci. 2014; 16(3): 319-328. http://doi.org/10.1590/1516-635x1603319-328
dc.relationNarinç D, Öksüz-Narinç N, Aygün A. Growth curve analyses in poultry science. World Poultry Sci. J. 2017. 73: 395-408. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933916001082
dc.relationAdenaike A, Akpan U, Udoh J, Wheto M, Durosaro S, Sanda A, Ikeobi C. Comparative evaluation of growth functions in three broiler strains of Nigerian chickens. J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2017; 40(4): 611-20. Recuperado de http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JTAS%20Vol.%2040%20(4)%20Nov.%202017/13%20JTAS%20Vol%2040%20(4)%20Nov%202017_0964-2016_pg611-620.pdf
dc.relationMarcu A, Vacaru I, Dumitrescu G, Petculescu L, Marcu A, Nicula M, et al. The influence of genetics on economic efficiency of broiler chickens growth. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013; 46(2): 339-46. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fe67/5a970be3fd76a1ae56164755261792ab142d.pdf
dc.relationPauwels J, Coopman F, Cools A, Michiels J, Fremaut D, De Smet S, Janssens G. Selection for growth performance in broiler chickens associates with less diet flexibility. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(6): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127819
dc.relationAbera D, Abebe A, Begna F, Tarekegn A, Alewi M. Growth performance, feasibility and carcass characteristics of Cobb 500 commercial broiler under small-scale production in western Ethiopia. Asian J. Poultry Sci. 2017; 11(1): 49-56. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2017.49.56
dc.relationUrdaneta-Rincon M, Leeson S. Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction on growth characteristics of male broiler chickens. Poultry Sci. 2002; 81(5): 679-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.5.679
dc.relationMendes A, Paixão S, Restelatto R, Reffatti R, Possenti J, Mooura D, et al. Effects of initial body weight and litter material on broiler production. Braz. J. Poultry Sci. 2011; 13(3): 165-170. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2011000300001
dc.relationInfante-Rodríguez F, Salinas-Chavira J, Montaño-Gómez M, Manríquez-Nuñez O, González-Vizcarra V, Guevara-Florentino O. Effect of diets with different energy concentrations on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat chemical composition of broiler chickens in dry tropics. SpringerPlus 2016; 5(1): 1937-1942. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3608-0
dc.relationAhiwe E, Omede A, Abdallh M, Iji P. Managing dietary energy intake by broiler chickens to reduce production costs and improve product quality. Animal Husbandry and Nutrition, Banu Yücel and Turgay Taskin, IntechOpen. 2018. http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76972
dc.relationHassanabadi A, Moghaddam H. Effect of Early Feed Restriction on Performance Characteristics and Serum Thyroxin of Broiler Chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006; 5(12): 1156-1159. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.1156.1159
dc.relationSalih R, Tesfaye E, Tamir B, Singh H. Effects of Feed Restriction on Production Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Koekoek Chickens in Ethiopia. Poult. Sci. J. 2016; 4(1): 55-61. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316787668_Effects_of_Feed_Restriction_on_Production_Performance_and_Carcass_Characteristics_of_Koekoek_Chickens_in_Ethiopia
dc.relationSantoso U. Effects of Early Feed Restriction on the Occurrence of Compensatory Growth, Feed Conversion Efficiency, Leg Abnormality and Mortality in Unsexed Broiler Chickens Reared in Cages. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2002; 15(9): 1319-1325. Recuperado de https://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/15_210.pdf
dc.relationRosero J, Guzmán E, López F. Evaluación del comportamiento productivo de las líneas de pollos de engorde Cobb 500 y Ross 308. Biotec. Sect. Agrop. Agroind. 2012; 10(1): 8-15. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/bsaa/v10n1/v10n1a02.pdf
dc.relationMoran E. Factores de producción que influyen en el rendimiento y la calidad de la carne de aves de granja. En: Richardson, R. y G. Mead (eds.) Ciencia de la carne de ave. Zaragoza, España: Editorial Acribia, S.A.; 1999. p. 203-221
dc.relationGarcía R, Ribeiro F, Miranda F, Graciano J, De Freitas L, Watte A, Marin D, Amadori A. Jejum alimentar pré-abate no rendimento e qualidade de carcaça de frangos de corte tipo griller. Agrarian. 2008;1(2):113-121. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256579040_Jejum_alimentar_pre-abate_no_rendimento_e_qualidade_de_carcaca_de_frangos_de_corte_tipo_griller_Feeding_fasting_pre-slaughter_in_yield_and_quality_of_carcass_of_broilers_type_griller
dc.relationBoostani A, Ashayerizadeh A, Mahmoodian H, Fard HR, Kamalzadeh A. Comparison of the effects of several feed restriction periods to control ascites on performance, carcass characteristics and hematological indices of broiler chickens. Braz. J. Poultry Sci. 2010;12(3):170-177. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000300006
dc.relationSahraei M. Effects of feed restriction on metabolic disorders in broiler chickens: a review. Biotec. in Anim. Hus. 2014;30(1):1-13. http://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1401001S
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rightsAcceso abierto
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectCrecimiento compensatorio
dc.subjecteficiencia alimenticia
dc.subjectpollos de engorde
dc.subjectrestricción alimenticia
dc.subjectsostenibilidad
dc.subjectcompensatory growth, feeding efficiency, broilers, feeding restriction, sustainability
dc.subjectCrescimento compensatório, eficiência alimentar, pintos de engorde, restrição alimentar, sustentabilidade
dc.titleEvaluación del comportamiento productivo de pollos Cobb 500 sometidos a restricción alimenticia como estrategia sostenible de control nutricional
dc.typeArtículo de investigación
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.19052/mv.vol1.iss39.9
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.coarversionVersión publicada
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.relation.citationstartpage85
dc.relation.citationendpage97
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de La Salle
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Ciencia Unisalle
dc.identifier.repo.urlrepourl:https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/
dc.relation.ispartofcitationissue39
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista de Medicina Veterinaria
dc.title.translatedEvaluation of the Productive Behavior of Cobb 500 Chickens under Feeding Restrictions as a Nutritional Control Sustainable Strategy
dc.title.translatedAvaliação do comportamento produtivo de pintos Cobb 500 submetidos a restrição alimentar como estratégia sustentável de controle nutricional


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución