dc.creator
dc.creatorAndrew Chubykalo
dc.date1998-03
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-12T19:49:25Z
dc.date.available2022-10-12T19:49:25Z
dc.identifier2470-0053
dc.identifier2470-0045
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/554
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4122781
dc.descriptionThe preceding Comment criticized the necessity of introducing an electrodynamics dualism concept based on a novel complete solution of Maxwell’s equations proposed in our previous paper @Phys. Rev. E 53, 5373 ~1996!#. All arguments made by the authors of the Comment to demonstrate the adequacy of the usual Lie´nard-Wiechert retarded solutions for a consistent description of electromagnetic phenomena are shown to be invalid beyond the context of boundary conditions for the inhomogeneous D’Alembert equation. From a reinterpretation of Villecco’s work @Phys. Rev. E 48, 4008 ~1993!# we concluded that it cannot be applied directly to refute our results and, in contrast to the opinion of the authors of the Comment, it can be used instead to support our claims of mathematical deficiency and inadequacy of Lie´nard-Wiechert retarded solutions. @S1063-651X~98!12402-9#
dc.descriptionProducción Científica de la Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas UAZ
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectinfo:eu-repo/classification/cti/1
dc.subjectseparated-potentials method
dc.subjectMaxwell equations
dc.titleReply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Action at a distance as a full-value solution of Maxwell equations: The basis and application of the separated-potentials method’ ’’
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.audiencegeneralPublic


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución