dc.contributorLibardi, Cleiton Augusto
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8953409094842074
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8700846438138378
dc.creatorSoligon, Samuel Domingos
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T10:31:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T21:32:49Z
dc.date.available2020-10-15T10:31:19Z
dc.date.available2022-10-10T21:32:49Z
dc.date.created2020-10-15T10:31:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-18
dc.identifierSOLIGON, Samuel Domingos. Treinamento suspenso vs. treinamento de força tradicional: efeitos na massa muscular, força e desempenho funcional em idosos. 2020. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Fisiológicas) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2020. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/13339.
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/13339
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4043569
dc.description.abstractPurpose We compared the effects of suspension training (ST) with traditional resistance training (TRT) on muscle mass, strength and functional performance in older adults. Methods Forty-two untrained older adults were randomized in TRT, ST (both performed 3 sets of whole body exercises to muscle failure) or control group (CON). Muscle thickness (MT) of biceps brachii (MTBB) and vastus lateralis (MTVL), maximal dynamic strength test (1RM) for biceps curl (1RMBC) and leg extension exercises (1RMLE), and functional performance tests (chair stand [CS], timed up and go [TUG] and maximal gait speed [MGS]) were performed before and after 12 weeks of training. Results MTBB increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT: 23.35%; ST: 21.56%). MTVL increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT: 13.03%; ST: 14.07%). 1RMBC increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT: 16.06%; ST: 14.33%). 1RMLE increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT: 14.89%; ST: 18.06%). MGS increased significantly and similarly for all groups (TRT: 6.26%; ST: 5.99%; CON: 2.87%). CS decreased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT: -20.80%; ST: -15.73%). TUG decreased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT: -8.66%; ST: -9.16%). Conclusion ST promotes similar muscle mass, strength and functional performance improvements compared to TRT in older adults.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisherUFSCar
dc.publisherPrograma Interinstitucional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas - PIPGCF
dc.publisherCâmpus São Carlos
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
dc.subjectTreinamento de força
dc.subjectTreinamento suspenso
dc.subjectFuncionalidade
dc.subjectEnvelhecimento
dc.subjectHipertrofia muscular
dc.subjectTreinamento de força com instabilidade
dc.subjectTRX training
dc.subjectFunctionality
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectMuscle hypertrophy
dc.subjectInstability resistance training
dc.titleTreinamento suspenso vs. treinamento de força tradicional: efeitos na massa muscular, força e desempenho funcional em idosos
dc.typeTesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución