dc.contributorLibardi, Cleiton Augusto
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8953409094842074
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2849423258149874
dc.creatorSilva, Natalia Santanielo
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T12:34:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T21:28:07Z
dc.date.available2019-07-31T12:34:17Z
dc.date.available2022-10-10T21:28:07Z
dc.date.created2019-07-31T12:34:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-18
dc.identifierSILVA, Natalia Santanielo. Treinamento de força realizado até a falha muscular versus não falha: efeitos na massa, força, ativação e arquitetura muscular de homens jovens treinados. 2019. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências Fisiológicas) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2019. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/11567.
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/11567
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4042002
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to compare the effect of resistance training (RT) performed to muscle failure (RT-F) or non-failure muscular (RT-NF) on muscle mass, muscle architecture and activation in trained young men. Thigh lean mass (TLM), vastus lateralis muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), architecture and 1-RM test were assessed at baseline (pre) and after ten (post) RT weeks. EMG amplitude assessment was performed after 10W RT. 14 young trained men participated in the present study were (23 ± 2.3 years, 171.7 ± 5.0 cm, 73.9 ± 5.8 kg). All protocols were similarly effective in increasing TLM (RT-F: 6371.7 ± 629.7 g to 6867.7 ± 657.8 g, RT-NF: 6401.1 ± 587.8 g to 6798.4 ± 610.0 g; P < 0.0001) and CSA (RT-F: 32.9 ± 5.3 cm2 to 37.7 ± 5.6 cm2, RT-NF: 33.1 ± 5.8 cm2 to 37.5 ± 6.6 cm2; P < 0.0001) from pre- to post-training. Both protocols showed significant increases in 1-RM values from pre- to post-training for 45° leg press (RT-F: 237.5 ± 21.6 kg to 290.0 ± 40.2 kg, RT-NF: 237.5 ± 32.9 kg to 299.9 ± 41.4 kg; P < 0.0001), leg extension (RT-F: 55.6 ± 8.6 kg to 73.2 ± 9.8 kg, RT-NF: 56.3 ± 9.5 kg to 73.8 ± 8.4 kg; P < 0.0001), and leg flexion (RT-F: 53.5 ± 8.0 kg to 64.3 ± 6.4 kg, RT-NF: 51.57 ± 7.9 kg to 63.2 ± 6.8 kg; P < 0.0001). EMG amplitude showed no significant differences between protocols (P > 0.05). In relation to the muscular architecture, both the pennation angle (PA) (TF-F: 22.5 ± 3.8º for 25.5 ± 3.8º, TF-NF: 23.1 ± 2.5º for 26.0 ± (P <0.0001) and the muscle fasciculus length (FL) (TF-F: 5.5 ± 0.53 cm for 6.0 ± 0.5 cm; TF-NF: 5.5 ± 0,5 cm for 6.0 ± 0.6 cm, P < 0.0001) showed significant increases from pre to pos-training. In conclusion, RT-F or RT-NF are equally efficient in promoting increases in muscle hypertrophy, and muscle strength, EMG amplitude, and muscle architecture.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de São Carlos
dc.publisherUFSCar
dc.publisherPrograma Interinstitucional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas - PIPGCF
dc.publisherCâmpus São Carlos
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectFalha concêntrica
dc.subjectAdaptações neuromusculares
dc.subjectÁrea de secção transversa
dc.subjectEletromiografia
dc.subjectFadiga
dc.subjectConcentric failure
dc.subjectNeuromuscular adaptations
dc.subjectMuscle cross-sectional area
dc.subjectElectromyography
dc.subjectFatigue.
dc.titleTreinamento de força realizado até a falha muscular versus não falha: efeitos na massa, força, ativação e arquitetura muscular de homens jovens treinados
dc.typeTesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución