dc.contributorHosp Santa Teresa
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
dc.contributorHosp Ipanema
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.creatorLabronici, Pedro José [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorFranco, Jose Sergio
dc.creatorSilva, Anselmo Fernandes da
dc.creatorCabral, Felipe Martins de Pina
dc.creatorSoares, Marcelo da Silva
dc.creatorLourenco, Paulo Roberto Barbosa de Toledo
dc.creatorHoffmann, Rolix
dc.creatorFernandes, Hélio Jorge Alvachian [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorReis, Fernando Baldy dos [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-15T12:39:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T21:19:57Z
dc.date.available2018-06-15T12:39:55Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T21:19:57Z
dc.date.created2018-06-15T12:39:55Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifierActa Ortopedica Brasileira. Sao Paulo Sp: Atha Comunicacao & Editora, v. 17, n. 1, p. 40-45, 2009.
dc.identifier1413-7852
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/42016
dc.identifierS1413-78522009000100008-en.pdf
dc.identifierS1413-78522009000100008-pt.pdf
dc.identifierS1413-78522009000100008
dc.identifier10.1590/S1413-78522009000100008
dc.identifierWOS:000267246200008
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4028636
dc.description.abstractObjective: to compare the results of fibula fixation (or non fixation) in the treatment of fractures located in the distal third of the tibia, by using intramedullary nailing and bridge plate. Method: 47 fractures on 47 patients were studied. Twenty-one patients were treated with non-reamed, interlocking intramedullary nailing, and 26 patients were treated with wide or narrow dynamic compression plates (using a minimally invasive technique). All of the fibular fractures were located at the same level or below tibial fractures. Results: in the group of patients treated with fibula fixation, the average healing time was 14.6 weeks. In the group of patients treated without fibula fixation, the average healing time was 14.3 weeks. In the group of patients treated with fibula fixation a significantly smaller proportion of valgus angular deviation (6.3%) was observed compared to the group of patients treated without fibula fixation (32.3%). Conclusions: The benefits of fibula fixation remain controversial when tibial fractures are associated. Regarding fracture healing, there was no significant difference between the studied fracture groups.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAtha Comunicacao & Editora
dc.relationActa Ortopedica Brasileira
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.subjectOsteosynthesis
dc.subjectBone plates
dc.subjectOrthopedic pin
dc.subjectTibia fracture
dc.titleTreatment of distal fractures of the tibia
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución