dc.contributorBrisbane Initiat Cohort 7
dc.contributorUniv Oxford
dc.contributorKeele Univ
dc.contributorUniv Nottingham
dc.contributorBrigham & Womens Hosp
dc.contributorHarvard Univ
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorUniv Manchester
dc.contributorFlinders Univ S Australia
dc.contributorMonash Univ
dc.creatorMahtani, Kamal Ram
dc.creatorProtheroe, Joanne
dc.creatorSlight, Sarah Patricia
dc.creatorDemarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorBlakeman, Thomas
dc.creatorBarton, Christopher A.
dc.creatorBrijnath, Bianca
dc.creatorRoberts, Nia
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:30:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T21:08:14Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:30:51Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T21:08:14Z
dc.date.created2016-01-24T14:30:51Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifierBmj Open. London: Bmj Publishing Group, v. 3, n. 1, 8 p., 2013.
dc.identifier2044-6055
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35673
dc.identifierWOS000315082400048.pdf
dc.identifier10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002058
dc.identifierWOS:000315082400048
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4027043
dc.description.abstractObjective: To examine if there is an increased participation in physical or sporting activities following an Olympic or Paralympic games.Design: Overview of systematic reviews.Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, DARE, SportDISCUS and Web of Knowledge databases. in addition, we searched for 'grey literature' in Google, Google scholar and on the International Olympic Committee websites. We restricted our search to those reviews published in English. We used the AMSTAR tool to assess the methodological quality of those systematic reviews included.Primary and secondary outcome measures: the primary outcome was evidence for an increased participation in physical or sporting activities. Secondary outcomes included public perceptions of sport during and after an Olympic games, barriers to increased sports participation and any other non-sporting health benefits.Results: Our systematic search revealed 844 citations, of which only two matched our inclusion criteria. the quality of these two reviews was assessed by three independent reviewers as 'good' using the AMSTAR tool for quality appraisal. Both reviews reported little evidence of an increased uptake of sporting activity following an Olympic Games event. Other effects on health, for example, changes in hospital admissions, suicide rates and drug use, were cited although there was insufficient evidence to see an overall effect.Conclusion: There is a paucity of evidence to support the notion that hosting an Olympic games leads to an increased participation in physical or sporting activities for host countries. We also found little evidence to suggest other health benefits. We conclude that the true success of these and future games should be evaluated by high-quality, evidence-based studies that have been commissioned before, during and following the completion of the event. Only then can the true success and legacy of the games be established.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBmj Publishing Group
dc.relationBmj Open
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.titleCan the London 2012 Olympics 'inspire a generation' to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews
dc.typeResenha


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución