dc.creatorMatsunaga, Fabio Teruo [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorTamaoki, Marcel Jun Sugawara [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorMatsumoto, Marcelo Hide [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorNetto, Nicola Archetti [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorFaloppa, Flavio [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorBelloti, Joao Carlos [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T14:02:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T20:57:23Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T14:02:17Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T20:57:23Z
dc.date.created2020-07-17T14:02:17Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierJournal Of Bone And Joint Surgery-American Volume. Needham, v. 99, n. 7, p. -, 2017.
dc.identifier0021-9355
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54725
dc.identifier10.2106/JBJS.16.00628
dc.identifierWOS:000399452800013
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4025317
dc.description.abstractBackground: Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace. Methods: A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand ( DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks
dc.description.abstract1, 2, and 6 months
dc.description.abstractand 1 year after the interventions. Results: The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group ( mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively
dc.description.abstractp = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph ( 2.0 degrees versus 10.5 degrees) ( both p < 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph. Conclusions: This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome ( DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJournal Bone Joint Surgery
dc.relationJournal Of Bone And Joint Surgery-American Volume
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.titleMinimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución