dc.contributor | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) | |
dc.creator | Rizzo, M. C. | |
dc.creator | Naspitz, C. K. | |
dc.creator | Sole, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-15T18:02:34Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-07T20:56:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-15T18:02:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-07T20:56:43Z | |
dc.date.created | 2018-06-15T18:02:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1995-11-01 | |
dc.identifier | Journal Of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology. Barcelona: J R Prous Sa, v. 5, n. 6, p. 354-356, 1995. | |
dc.identifier | 1018-9068 | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44444 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:A1995TM55600010 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4025167 | |
dc.description.abstract | Fifty-five patients were skin-tested by Multi-Test (M) and needle prick test (NPT) to compare the reproducibility of the methods. lye used 6 allergenic extracts: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, dog epithelium, cat pelt, American cockroach and mixed molds. A glycerosaline and a positive control (histamine 1 mg/ml) were performed in both methods. Statistically significant differences in histamine and Dermatophagoides farinae wheal reactions between the two methods (M>NPT) were found, with no differences with the other allergenic extracts. We concluded that the two methods are similar with respect to determining the immediate hypersensitivity, but the Multi-Test is better accepted by children. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | J R Prous Sa | |
dc.relation | Journal Of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.subject | multi-Test | |
dc.subject | prick test | |
dc.subject | reproducibility | |
dc.subject | immediate hypersensitivity | |
dc.title | Comparative performance for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing using two skin prick test devices | |
dc.type | Artigo | |