dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.creatorRizzo, M. C.
dc.creatorNaspitz, C. K.
dc.creatorSole, D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-15T18:02:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T20:56:43Z
dc.date.available2018-06-15T18:02:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T20:56:43Z
dc.date.created2018-06-15T18:02:34Z
dc.date.issued1995-11-01
dc.identifierJournal Of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology. Barcelona: J R Prous Sa, v. 5, n. 6, p. 354-356, 1995.
dc.identifier1018-9068
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44444
dc.identifierWOS:A1995TM55600010
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4025167
dc.description.abstractFifty-five patients were skin-tested by Multi-Test (M) and needle prick test (NPT) to compare the reproducibility of the methods. lye used 6 allergenic extracts: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, dog epithelium, cat pelt, American cockroach and mixed molds. A glycerosaline and a positive control (histamine 1 mg/ml) were performed in both methods. Statistically significant differences in histamine and Dermatophagoides farinae wheal reactions between the two methods (M>NPT) were found, with no differences with the other allergenic extracts. We concluded that the two methods are similar with respect to determining the immediate hypersensitivity, but the Multi-Test is better accepted by children.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJ R Prous Sa
dc.relationJournal Of Investigational Allergology & Clinical Immunology
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subjectmulti-Test
dc.subjectprick test
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectimmediate hypersensitivity
dc.titleComparative performance for immediate hypersensitivity skin testing using two skin prick test devices
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución