dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorMem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr
dc.creatorLindsey, Susan C. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorGanly, Ian
dc.creatorPalmer, Frank
dc.creatorTuttle, R. Michael
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:40:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T20:55:41Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:40:01Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T20:55:41Z
dc.date.created2016-01-24T14:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-01
dc.identifierThyroid. New Rochelle: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc, v. 25, n. 2, p. 242-249, 2015.
dc.identifier1050-7256
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38718
dc.identifier10.1089/thy.2014.0277
dc.identifierWOS:000349012300014
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4024921
dc.description.abstractBackground: Risk stratification in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) has traditionally relied on standardized anatomic staging systems that, despite providing valuable prognostic information, do not adequately predict the risk of persistent or recurrent disease. As dynamic risk stratification has been demonstrated to be clinically valuable in nonmedullary thyroid cancer, we adapted our response to therapy definitions in order to apply them to MTC. in this study, we evaluate and compare the clinical utility of our previously proposed MTC response to therapy stratification with a traditional standardized anatomic staging system.Methods: Both the Tumor, Node, Metastasis/American Joint Cancer Committee (TNM/AJCC) staging system and our previously proposed response to initial therapy staging system was evaluated in 287 MTC patients followed for a median of five years.Results: the TNM/AJCC staging system provided adequate risk stratification with regard to disease-specific mortality and the likelihood of having no evidence of disease at final follow-up, but did not adequately stratify patients with regard to the likelihood of having structural persistent disease, biochemical persistent disease, or recurrence. However, the response to initial therapy risk stratification system provided clinically useful risk stratification with regard to disease-specific mortality, the likelihood of having no evidence of disease at final follow-up, the likelihood of having a biochemical persistent disease at final follow-up, and the likelihood of having structural persistent disease at final follow-up. Furthermore, the response to therapy risk stratification system demonstrated a higher proportion of variance explained (54.3%) than the TNM/AJCC system (23.9%).Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that a dynamic risk stratification system that uses response to therapy variables to adjust risk estimates over time provides more useful clinical prognostic information than static initial anatomic staging in MTC thyroid cancer.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relationThyroid
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.titleResponse to Initial Therapy Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Medullary Thyroid Cancer
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución