dc.contributorUniv Toronto
dc.contributorCross Canc Inst
dc.contributorBank Cyprus Oncol Ctr
dc.contributorTanta Univ Hosp
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributorReg Canc Ctr
dc.contributorSt Etienne Univ Hosp
dc.contributorNatl Yang Ming Univ
dc.contributorKaohsiung Med Univ Hosp
dc.contributorNatl Taiwan Univ
dc.contributorEORTC Headquarters
dc.creatorZeng, Liang
dc.creatorChow, Edward
dc.creatorBedard, Gillian
dc.creatorZhang, Liying
dc.creatorFairchild, Alysa
dc.creatorVassiliou, Vassilios
dc.creatorEl-Din, Mohamed A. Alm
dc.creatorJesus-Garcia, Reynaldo [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorKumar, Aswin
dc.creatorForges, Fabien
dc.creatorTseng, Ling-Ming
dc.creatorHou, Ming-Feng
dc.creatorChie, Wei-Chu
dc.creatorBottomley, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:27:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T20:55:27Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:27:58Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T20:55:27Z
dc.date.created2016-01-24T14:27:58Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-01
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. New York: Elsevier B.V., v. 84, n. 3, p. E337-E342, 2012.
dc.identifier0360-3016
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/35471
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.028
dc.identifierWOS:000309560600011
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4024863
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective method of palliating painful bone metastases and can improve function and reduce analgesic requirements. in advanced cancer patients, quality of life (QOL) is the primary outcome of interest over traditional endpoints such as survival. the purpose of our study was to compare bone metastasis-specific QOL scores among patients who responded differently to palliative RT.Methods and Materials: Patients receiving RT for bone metastases across 6 countries were prospectively enrolled from March 2010-January 2011 in a trial validating the QLQ-BM22 and completed the QLQ-BM22 and the core measure (QLQ-C30) at baseline and after 1 month. Pain scores and analgesic intake were recorded, and response to RT was determined according to the latest published guidelines. the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared changes in QOL among response groups. A Bonferroni-adjusted P<.003 indicated statistical significance.Results: of 79 patients who received palliative RT, 59 were assessable. Partial response, pain progression, and indeterminate response were observed in 22, 8, and 29 patients, respectively; there were no patients with a complete response. Patients across all groups had similar baseline QOL scores apart from physical functioning (patients who progressed had better initial functioning). One month after RT, patients who responded had significant improvements in 3 of 4 QLQ-BM22 domains (painful site, P<.0001; painful characteristic, P<.0001; and functional interference, P<.0001) and 3 QLQ-C30 domains (physical functioning, P=.0006; role functioning, P=.0026; and pain, P<.0001). Patients with progression in pain had significantly worse functional interference (P=.0007) and pain (P=.0019).Conclusions: Patients who report pain relief after palliative RT also have better QOL with respect to bone metastasis-specific issues. the QLQ-BM22 and QLQ-C30 are able to discriminate among patients with varying responses and are recommended for use in future bone metastasis clinical trials. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.titleQuality of Life After Palliative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Painful Bone Metastases: Results of an International Study Validating the EORTC QLQ-BM22
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución