dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.creatorAssis-Borba, Luciana [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorCristelli, Marina P. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorPaula, Mayara I. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorFranco, Marcelo F. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorTedesco-Silva, Helio [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorMedina-Pestana, Jose O. [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-24T14:37:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T20:55:00Z
dc.date.available2016-01-24T14:37:39Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T20:55:00Z
dc.date.created2016-01-24T14:37:39Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-01
dc.identifierInternational Urology and Nephrology. Dordrecht: Springer, v. 46, n. 8, p. 1663-1671, 2014.
dc.identifier0301-1623
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/38036
dc.identifier10.1007/s11255-014-0695-0
dc.identifierWOS:000340523800029
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4024733
dc.description.abstractAlthough the use of kidney allografts from expanded criteria donors (ECD) has increased in recent years, the reported discard rates are also growing. the influence of ECD characteristics on transplant outcomes is still underevaluated.This retrospective study investigated the influence of preimplantation biopsy findings and delayed graft function (DGF) on patient and graft survivals and renal function at 36 months in a cohort of 372 ECD kidney transplant recipients.Patient and graft survivals were 91.6 and 68.9 %. the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 31 %. There were no differences in patient (88.6 vs. 91.1 vs. 94.7 vs. 78.6 %, p = 0.10) or graft (78.1 vs. 72.2 vs. 60.5 vs. 62.6 %, p = 0.14) survivals and renal function (41.7 +/- A 25.6 vs. 39.9 +/- A 29.9 vs. 38.1 +/- A 30.6 vs. 37.4 +/- A 29.2 mL/min, p = 0.79) comparing ECD kidneys with mild, moderate, and severe histological changes or with no preimplantation biopsy, respectively. However, severe scored transplants had the worst death-censored graft survival (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.4-6.9, p = 0.007). No significant differences in patient (86.2 vs. 83.4 %, p = 0.17) or graft (73.7 vs. 65.9 %, p = 0.06) survivals and renal function (38.9 +/- A 28.6 vs. 39.9 +/- A 28.4 mL/min, p = 0.72) were observed comparing patients with or without DGF. Multivariable analysis found diabetes history as the only independent risk factor for graft loss (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.3-3.3, p = 0.003) or patient death (OR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.5-5.8, p < 0.001).Within the limitations of sample size and short follow-up time, in this cohort of ECD kidney transplant recipients the severity of histological changes observed in preimplantation biopsies was independently associated with graft loss.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relationInternational Urology and Nephrology
dc.rightshttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subjectExpanded criteria donors
dc.subjectGraft histology
dc.subjectKidney transplantation
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.titleExpanding the use of expanded criteria donors in kidney transplantation
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución