dc.creatorBarbosa, Jose B., Jr. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorDe Farias, Charles Costa [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorHirai, Flavio E. [UNIFESP]
dc.creatorPereira Gomes, Jose A. [UNIFESP]
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T14:02:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-07T20:41:46Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T14:02:42Z
dc.date.available2022-10-07T20:41:46Z
dc.date.created2020-07-17T14:02:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifierEuropean Journal Of Ophthalmology. Milan, v. 27, n. 2, p. 135-140, 2017.
dc.identifier1120-6721
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/54959
dc.identifier10.5301/ejo.5000773
dc.identifierWOS:000401747200173
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/4021379
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) associated with narrow-strip conjunctival autograft vs conjunctival autograft alone for the treatment of recurrent pterygium. Methods: In this prospective consecutive interventional study, patients with recurrent pterygium were randomly divided into one of 2 groups
dc.description.abstractgroup 1: patients undergoing AMT associated with autologous conjunctival graft
dc.description.abstractand group 2: patients undergoing conjunctival autograft alone. Results: Of the 80 operated eyes included in this study, 39 (group 1, mean patient age 52.1 +/- 11.7 SD years) underwent AMT associated with narrow-strip conjunctival autograft and 41 (group 2, mean patient age 45.8 +/- 12.9 SD years) underwent conjunctival autograft alone. In group 1, 6 eyes (15.4%) had grade 1 pterygium, 19 eyes (48.7%) had grade 2 pterygium, and 14 eyes (35.9%) had grade 3 pterygium. In the second group, 5 eyes (12.2%) had grade 1 pterygium, 18 eyes (43.9%) had grade 2 pterygium, and 14 eyes (35.9%) had grade 3 pterygium. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups (p = 0.752). Of the 39 eyes in group 1, recurrent pterygium was observed in 7 cases (17.9%). However, of the 41 eyes in group 2, recurrent pterygium was observed in only 4 cases (9.75%). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups (p = 0.2684). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that conjunctival autograft alone might be a better surgical choice for the treatment of recurrent pterygia than combining it with AMT
dc.description.abstracthowever, this second option provides a good surgical alternative in cases where little conjunctival donor tissue is available.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWichtig Publishing
dc.relationEuropean Journal Of Ophthalmology
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.subjectConjunctival disease
dc.subjectCornea
dc.subjectPterygium
dc.titleAmniotic membrane transplantation with narrow-strip conjunctival autograft vs conjunctival autograft for recurrent pterygia
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución