doctoralThesis
Investigando a pró-socialidade em crianças e sua associação com o status socioeconômico
Fecha
2021-03-26Registro en:
BOCCARDI, Natalia Andrea Craciun. Investigando a pró-socialidade em crianças e sua associação
com o status socioeconômico. 2021. 321f. Tese (Doutorado em Psicobiologia) - Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2021.
Autor
Boccardi, Natalia Andrea Craciun
Resumen
There is an ongoing effort by researchers to understand what are the universal factors that
favor prosociality in its various forms. One of these factors is socioeconomic status (SES).
Evidence on the association between status and prosociality is controversial both in children
and adults. To contribute to the discussion, we investigated this association in children aged
7-11 years. Before the empirical studies, we discuss the evolution of hierarchies in human
societies and how SES is associated with prosocial behavior. We posit that it is a complex and
malleable association, being necessary to investigate what are the intermediary factors. To
answer this, we elaborate the first empirical chapter that serves as a basis for the others: we
compare prosociality measures. We observed that economic games, more specifically the
Public Goods Game and the Dictator Game, showed inter-situational consistency with
caveats, and that had no external validity when compared to the behavioral frequency of
children in the classroom (naturalistic observation). These results do not invalidate the use of
games, but emphasize the importance of interpreting their results within specific contexts. In
the next two chapters we bring the status stratification: we investigated association using
different SES parameters and different prosocial measures, in addition to individual and
contextual factors. The results are mixed, but in none of them low-SES children cooperated
less than another group of children. They cooperated more or didn't differ. We emphasize that
the association between SES and prosociality was influenced when the stratification
parameter was objective or subjective SES; when the social context was anonymous or
non-anonymous; or when the child interacted with their own classmates, an unknown
classroom, or in a non-social condition. Also, when the stratification parameter was parental
education, there was a U-shaped association for cooperation with their classmates. We
discuss the results using theories from different areas such as evolutionary psychology sociology and anthropology. In addition to proposing new methodologies to investigate
pro-sociality in children, as far as we know, we are the first to investigate the association
between SES and prosociality in Brazilian children through multi-methods.