A filiação teórica na escrita do pesquisador em formação: uma análise sobre a genealogia do dizer acadêmico pelas formas da língua

Abstract

This research has as object of study the dialogical relationship between the subject and the other discourse that builds a theoretical affiliation in the writing of the researcher in formation, specifically in doctoral thesis. From the perspective that dialogism is the language foundation (BAKHTIN / VOLOCHINOV, 2006), that every statement is made in the midst of the alreadysaid and as such carries a genealogy (BAKHTIN, 2003), observable in the materiality of language, we elaborate our research questions: How does dialogism engender the theoretical affiliation in academic writing? What do linguistic forms show about a genealogy that establishes this writing? Our hypothesis is that theoretical affiliation is a process that produces meanings, which can be observed and understood from a series of linguistic-discursive operations carried out by the subject, who elaborates his writing in dialogue with different voices. We define as general objective to understand how the dialogism engenders the affiliation from the survey and the analysis of linguistic-discursive operations observable in the materiality of doctoral theses. The construction of doubt, hypothesis, objective and the search for answers is still based on the enunciative studies of Benveniste (2005, 2006) and Authier- Revuz (1998, 2004) on a relation between the subject and the other discourse printed in the language forms and in the anthropological studies of Lévi-Strauss (1982) on the weight of culture for the formation of families and for the functioning of kinship systems, in which members assume different places and functions. This interdisciplinary dialogue has raised specific questions about: What kind of voices does the subject call to show himself as an affiliate? How does he dialogue with them? What place and function are assigned to the called voices? We took as corpus a set of doctoral theses, collected in the virtual library Domínio Público. We deal, methodologically, with these linguistic-discursive operations as indications (GINZBURG, 1989) that let us see and categorize the voices that constitute the theoretical affiliation. The results confirm the hypothesis raised, show that through the materiality of writing it is possible to observe different familiar arrangements, defined from the dialogue that the researcher establishes with the voice of the other in different levels of otherness.