doctoralThesis
Macrofauna de ambientes não consolidados adjacentes à recifes da área de proteção ambiental dos recifes de corais Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil
Fecha
2013-12-16Registro en:
VIANA, Marina Gomes. Macrofauna de ambientes não consolidados adjacentes à recifes da área de proteção ambiental dos recifes de corais Rio Grande do Norte,
Brasil. 2013. 156 f. Tese (Doutorado em Bioecologia Aquática) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2013.
Autor
Viana, Marina Gomes
Resumen
This study aimed to characterize, for the first time, the benthic invertebrates that inhabit the
region of soft bottoms adjacent to the APARC reefs in order to situate them as an important
component of infralittoral coastal areas of Northeast Brazil. Soft bottoms areas of APARC
corresponds to infralittoral zones vegetated by seagrass Halodule wrightii and unvegetated
infralittoral zones, both subjected to substantial hydrodynamic stress. Through scuba diving,
biological and sedimentary samples of both habitats were analyzed, with a cylindrical sampler.
We identified 6160 individuals belonging to 16 groups and 224 species. The most abundant
macrofaunal group was Polychaeta (43%), followed by Mollusca (25%) and Crustacea (14%),
what was expected for these environments. In the first chapter, regarding vegetated areas, we
tested three hypotheses: the existence of differences in the faunal structure associated with H.
wrightii banks submitted to different hydrodynamic conditions; the occurrence of minor temporal
variations on the associated macrofauna of banks protected from hydrodynamic stress; and if the
diversity of macrofauna is affected by both benthophagous predators and H. wrightii biomass. It
was observed that macrofauna associated at the Exposed bank showed differences in structure
when comparing the Protected bank, the granulometry of the sediments, that co-varies with the
hydrodynamism, was the cause of these variations. The results also pointed to a lower temporal
variation in the macrofaunal structure on the Protected bank and a negative relation between
macrofaunal and benthophagous fish abundance. At the Exposed bank, a greater faunal diversity
was observed, probably due to the higher seagrass biomass. The second chapter compares the
vegetated and non-vegetated areas in order to test the hypothesis that due to greater seasonal
stability in tropical environments, seagrass structure would act to distinguish the vegetated and
non-vegetated areas macrofauna, over time. It was also expected that depositivores were the
most representative invertebrates on non-vegetated environments, on the assumption that the
seagrass bank would work as a source of debris to adjacent areas, enriching them. Considering
all sampling periods, the total macrofauna abundance and diversity were higher in vegetated
areas, when compared to non-vegetated ones. Seasonally, the structural complexity provided by
Halodule differentiated more clearly the fauna from vegetated and non-vegetated areas, but only
at the climatic extremes, i.e. Dry season (extreme climatic stability, with low hydronamism
variation) and Rainy season (great hydrodynamism variation and probably vegetated bank
burial). Furthermore, the high organic matter levels measured in the sandy banks coincided with
an outstanding trophic importance of deposit feeders, proving the debris-carrying hypothesis.
The last chapter focused on the non-vegetated areas, where we tested that the hypothesis
infaunal halo in tropical reefs depending on local granulometry. In this context, we also tested the
hypothesis that benthophagous fish predation would have an effect on the low abundance of
macrofaunal groups due to the high hydrographic stress, thus allowing other predatory groups to
have greater importance in these environments. Proving the hypothesis, no spatial variation, both
on abundance families neither on community structure, occur along distance of the edge reefs.
However, we found that complex combinations of physical factors (grain size and organic matter
levels originated from local hydronamic conditions) covary with the distance from the reefs and
has stronger influence on macrofauna than considered biological factors, such as predation by
benthophagous fishes. Based on the main results, this study shows that unconsolidated areas
around APARC reefs are noteworthy from an ecological and conservational point of view, as
evidenced by the biota-environment and organismal relations, never before described for these
areas