dc.contributor | Duarte Neto, Bento Herculano | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/1337790344430141 | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/4448792481460599 | |
dc.contributor | Freire, Leonardo Oliveira | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/3263821619188327 | |
dc.contributor | Silva, Sara Maria de Andrade | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/1662024013043312 | |
dc.creator | Neves, George Hilton Lemos | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-10T23:23:14Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-06T12:40:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-10T23:23:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-06T12:40:54Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-03-10T23:23:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-10 | |
dc.identifier | NEVES, George Hilton Lemos. Judicialização da política e ativismo judicial: uma violação ao princípio da separação dos poderes ou uma necessidade para a efetivação plena dos direitos fundamentais na sociedade brasileira contemporânea?. 2021. 156f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) - Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2021. | |
dc.identifier | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/46519 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3957041 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present work deals with the institutional rise of the Judiciary in the contemporary
Brazilian scenario, especially with regard to the judicialization of politics and judicial activism,
highlighting the preponderance that this constitutionally established institution has acquired
over the years, assuming extreme importance within of society, playing an active role in the
implementation of Fundamental Rights, whether by suppressing omissions or correcting
distortions resulting from the performance of the Legislative Power with regard to the
elaboration of norms, or of the Executive Power with regard to the execution of public
policies. In this context, the principles of the Supremacy of the Constitution and the
Separation of Powers will be addressed, as well as the historical evolution of State models to
the present day, relating these aspects to the issue of the realization of Fundamental Rights.
The research took as its starting point the question regarding the following problem: the
judicialization of politics and judicial activism in the Brazilian Democratic State of Law are
appropriate phenomena to achieve the full realization of Fundamental Rights or would they
be violating the principle of Separation of Powers? The study of the selected theme is
important because this preponderance of the Judiciary is causing relevant tension between
the State Powers, bringing up the discussion about the harmony of Powers and the survival
of democratic principles, giving rise to a complex debate about this more active action. of the
Judiciary, which brings relevant political, economic and social impacts to the population and
which are directly related to the realization of the Fundamental Rights constitutionally
foreseen, essential to provide a dignified life to all citizens. Faced with the presented
problem, the main objective of the work is to analyze the phenomena of the judicialization of
politics and judicial activism in contemporary Brazil, based on the principle of the Separation
of Powers, confronting it with the need for the full realization of Fundamental Rights, the in
order to establish what should prevail in cases in which they appear to be conflicting. The
methodology used to carry out the research consists of an applied research, with a
hypothetical-deductive and qualitative approach, with a descriptive objective. Also using the
dialectical and historical method. At the end of the research, after carrying out the
considerations for and against the institutional rise of the Judiciary, it was concluded that,
despite the apparent instability that the judicialization of politics and, mainly, judicial activism,
in the usual conception of the term, can bring to the spheres of power, the performance of
the judiciary is extremely relevant in the search for the effective protection of Fundamental
Rights and the Democratic State of Law, since when the guarantee of Fundamental Rights is
pursued, embodied in the text of the Federal Constitution 1988, the Judiciary can and, not
infrequently, has the obligation to participate in the typical decisions of other branches of the
State without this implying in an affront to the principle of Separation of Powers, since the
most active posture of the judiciary has its legitimacy based, formally, in the Constitution
itself and, materially, in the need to protect the Democratic State Law and the Fundamental Rights. | |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte | |
dc.publisher | Brasil | |
dc.publisher | UFRN | |
dc.publisher | PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO | |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | |
dc.subject | Separação dos poderes | |
dc.subject | Estado Democrático de Direito | |
dc.subject | Direitos Fundamentais | |
dc.subject | Judicialização da política | |
dc.subject | Ativismo judicial | |
dc.title | Judicialização da política e ativismo judicial: uma violação ao princípio da separação dos poderes ou uma necessidade para a efetivação plena dos direitos fundamentais na sociedade brasileira contemporânea? | |
dc.type | masterThesis | |